Comparison Overview

Zebra Technologies

VS

Mastercard

Zebra Technologies

3 Overlook Point, Lincolnshire, IL, 60069, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Zebra (NASDAQ: ZBRA) helps organizations monitor, anticipate, and accelerate workflows by empowering their frontline and ensuring that everyone and everything is visible, connected and fully optimized. Our award-winning portfolio spans software to innovations in robotics, machine vision, automation and digital decisioning, all backed by a +50-year legacy in scanning, track-and-trace and mobile computing solutions. With an ecosystem of 10,000 partners across more than 100 countries, Zebra’s customers include over 80% of the Fortune 500. Newsweek recently recognized Zebra as one of America’s Most Loved Workplaces and Greatest Workplaces for Diversity, and we are on Fast Company’s list of the Best Workplaces for Innovators.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,126
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mastercard

2000 Purchase St, Purchase, NY, US, 10577
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Mastercard powers economies and empowers people in 200+ countries and territories worldwide. Together with our customers, we’re building a sustainable economy where everyone can prosper. We support a wide range of digital payments choices, making transactions secure, simple, smart and accessible. Our technology and innovation, partnerships and networks combine to deliver a unique set of products and services that help people, businesses and governments realize their greatest potential.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 42,954
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zebra-technologies.jpeg
Zebra Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mastercard.jpeg
Mastercard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zebra Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mastercard
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zebra Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mastercard in 2025.

Incident History — Zebra Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zebra Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mastercard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mastercard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zebra-technologies.jpeg
Zebra Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mastercard.jpeg
Mastercard
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: malware, ransomware, social engineering
Motivation: Information Extraction
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Mastercard company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zebra Technologies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Mastercard company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Zebra Technologies company has not reported any.

In the current year, Mastercard company and Zebra Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Mastercard company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Zebra Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Mastercard company nor Zebra Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mastercard company nor Zebra Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zebra Technologies company nor Mastercard company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor Mastercard holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Mastercard company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Zebra Technologies company.

Mastercard company employs more people globally than Zebra Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor Mastercard holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor Mastercard holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor Mastercard holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor Mastercard holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor Mastercard holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor Mastercard holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X