Comparison Overview

ZAMP

VS

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

ZAMP

São Paulo, 05501-050, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.zamp.com.br/

Somos um grande ecossistema de restaurantes que reúne marcas internacionais como Burger King®, Popeyes®, Starbucks® e Subway®. E, por trás de cada receita de sucesso, estão os Zampers: gente que faz acontecer, que joga junto e que deixa sua marca todos os dias. Aqui, a gente acredita que o verdadeiro sabor do sucesso é ter espaço pra criar, crescer, liderar e ser quem você é. Usamos tecnologia, inovação e muita parceria para entregar experiências que surpreendem nossos clientes e geram oportunidades para o nosso time. Temos apetite pelo futuro e ousadia para conquistar novos mercados, novos sabores e novas conexões. Porque grandes marcas só existem quando grandes pessoas constroem algo maior do que elas mesmas. Isso é a Zamp®: um ecossistema de restaurantes e pessoas em constante evolução.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 11,009
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center

5200 Buffington Road, None, Atlanta, GA, US, 30349
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.chick-fil-a.com/careers

At its Atlanta headquarters, known as the Corporate Support Center, Chick-fil-A, Inc. offers full-time careers in various fields such as Digital Transformation & Technology, Financial Services & Accounting, Enterprise Analytics, Restaurant Development, Early Talent Programs and more. Our team of more than 3,000 staff members tackles complex challenges every day — from restaurant design to food innovation, to infusing personalized service into digital spaces — all with the intent of supporting our owner-operators in delivering customer experiences defined by hospitality and care. Chick-fil-A, Inc. is the third largest quick-service restaurant company in the United States, known for its freshly-prepared food, signature hospitality and unique franchise model. More than 200,000 Team Members are employed by independent owner-operators in more than 3,000 restaurants across the United States, Canada, and Puerto Rico. In 2023, the company shared plans to expand by 2030 into Europe and Asia. Chick-fil-A owner-operators live and work in the communities their restaurants serve, each supporting local efforts to address hunger, education, and making a positive impact. The family-owned and privately held company was founded in 1967 by S. Truett Cathy.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 79,628
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zamp.jpeg
ZAMP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chick-fil-a-corporate.jpeg
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ZAMP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZAMP in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center in 2025.

Incident History — ZAMP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZAMP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zamp.jpeg
ZAMP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chick-fil-a-corporate.jpeg
Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ZAMP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ZAMP company has not reported any.

In the current year, Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company and ZAMP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company nor ZAMP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ZAMP company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company nor ZAMP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ZAMP company nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ZAMP nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ZAMP company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company.

Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center company employs more people globally than ZAMP company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither ZAMP nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ZAMP nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ZAMP nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ZAMP nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ZAMP nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ZAMP nor Chick-fil-A Corporate Support Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References