Comparison Overview

Marc Z Legal Staffing

VS

Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team

Marc Z Legal Staffing

10 Post Office Square, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

We specialize in identifying top tier attorneys, paralegals, and legal support personnel, and connecting them with legal firms and companies all over New England. At Marc Z Legal Staffing, we take great pride in our premier staffing services. Our company functions like an independent law firm, with top-tier law practitioners, litigators, administrators and human resource representatives. We focus solely on the legal industry, which makes us experts at placing attorneys, paralegals, and business professionals of all levels of experience in Boston, Rhode Island and all through New England, on both contract and full-time bases. Visit our website - or please don't hesitate to reach out to us! - for more information.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team

undefined, Carlisle, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

As a team of highly experienced Costs Lawyers and Costs Draftsmen we are able to assist our Clients with all costs matters relating Private Client (Court of Protection, Probate & Family) work. Our aim is to build a long term business relationship with each and every client, and to offer a completely professional, yet personal approach to all your legal costing needs. This means tailoring our service to fit your needs. By instructing Paramount Legal Costs you will see an improvement not only in legal costs recovery but also in file turnaround and more importantly cash flow, safe in the knowledge that your files are in expert hands.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

Compliance Summary
Marc Z Legal Staffing
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Marc Z Legal Staffing in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team in 2025.

Incident History — Marc Z Legal Staffing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Marc Z Legal Staffing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/z-legal-staffing.jpeg
Marc Z Legal Staffing
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/paramount-legal-costs-limited.jpeg
Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team
Incidents

FAQ

Both Marc Z Legal Staffing company and Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Marc Z Legal Staffing company.

In the current year, Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company and Marc Z Legal Staffing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company nor Marc Z Legal Staffing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company nor Marc Z Legal Staffing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company nor Marc Z Legal Staffing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Marc Z Legal Staffing company nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Marc Z Legal Staffing nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Marc Z Legal Staffing company nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team company employs more people globally than Marc Z Legal Staffing company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Marc Z Legal Staffing nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Marc Z Legal Staffing nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Marc Z Legal Staffing nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Marc Z Legal Staffing nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Marc Z Legal Staffing nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Marc Z Legal Staffing nor Paramount Legal Costs Private Client Team holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X