Comparison Overview

Yurchak Printing, Inc.

VS

Tamper Technologies Ltd

Yurchak Printing, Inc.

920 Links Avenue, Landisville, PA, 17538, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 750 and 799

Yurchak Printing, Inc. was founded in 1998 with the goal of offering high quality, short-run digital book manufacturing services to the publishing industry, manufacturing and service companies, professional associations, government agencies, as well as colleges and universities. Our services were created to fulfill a need brought about by the digital age. We believe that all publishers and businesses should have the ability to offer print as a valuable resource of communication. By utilizing our print on demand and digital technology capabilities they can satisfy the demand of the marketplace and maintain an additional revenue source while eliminating/reducing inventory, obsolescence and increase cash flow. Today Yurchak Printing Inc. is a leader in digital short-run book manufacturing by specializing in solutions for the production of directories, periodical and journals, reference books, fine edition and illustrated books, bibles, children’s books, bound galley’s and university press books. We offer a wide variety of binding styles on different paper substrates in quantities of 1 to 1500 copies.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tamper Technologies Ltd

None
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Tamper Technologies is a specialist, security label and tape manufacturer with a proven base of expertise in printing, adhesives, silicone release technology and converting, with a rapidly expanding network of approved distributors throughout the world. ISO 9001 2015 approved. Tamper Technologies, is a leading manufacturer of security tamper evident labels and tapes, won the prestigious Queen’s Award for Enterprise 2010 in the International Trade category and the Queen’s Award for Enterprise 2015 for Innovation. TamperTech’s range of security tapes and tamper evident labels add to the security of cartons, crates, polythene bags, packaging and boxes worldwide. Tamper Technologies success as a manufacturer of tamper evident solutions ensures we provide customers with both standard and customer specific solutions depending upon their requirements. We provide a fast turnaround and quality products. TamperTech offer a range of overt and covert security tape and label solutions, please contact us to find out more

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yurchak-printing-inc..jpeg
Yurchak Printing, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tamper-technologies-limited.jpeg
Tamper Technologies Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yurchak Printing, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tamper Technologies Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yurchak Printing, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tamper Technologies Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Yurchak Printing, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yurchak Printing, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tamper Technologies Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tamper Technologies Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yurchak-printing-inc..jpeg
Yurchak Printing, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tamper-technologies-limited.jpeg
Tamper Technologies Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Yurchak Printing, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tamper Technologies Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tamper Technologies Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Yurchak Printing, Inc. company.

In the current year, Tamper Technologies Ltd company and Yurchak Printing, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tamper Technologies Ltd company nor Yurchak Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tamper Technologies Ltd company nor Yurchak Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tamper Technologies Ltd company nor Yurchak Printing, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yurchak Printing, Inc. company nor Tamper Technologies Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yurchak Printing, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Yurchak Printing, Inc. company nor Tamper Technologies Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Yurchak Printing, Inc. company employs more people globally than Tamper Technologies Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Yurchak Printing, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yurchak Printing, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yurchak Printing, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yurchak Printing, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yurchak Printing, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yurchak Printing, Inc. nor Tamper Technologies Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L