Comparison Overview

Yum! Brands

VS

Culver's Restaurants

Yum! Brands

1441 Gardiner Lane, None, Louisville, KY, US, 40213
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Yum! Brands, Inc., based in Louisville, Kentucky, and its subsidiaries franchise or operate a system of over 60,000 restaurants in more than 155 countries and territories under the Company’s concepts – KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut and the Habit Burger Grill. The Company's KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut brands are global leaders of the chicken, Mexican-style food, and pizza categories, respectively. The Habit Burger Grill is a fast casual restaurant concept specializing in made-to-order chargrilled burgers, sandwiches and more. What makes Yum! a great place to work? It's our people. As the world's largest restaurant company, we invest in people capability so that our global workforce can make the most of their careers. With ongoing opportunities for personal and professional success, we've built a culture that rewards and recognizes great effort while providing the flexibility that is so important to all of us.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 7,314
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Culver's Restaurants

1240 Water St., Prairie Du Sac, WI, US, 53578
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

With strong, Midwestern family values and genuine hometown hospitality, Culver’s® has proudly served its signature ButterBurgers® and Fresh Frozen Custard since we opened our first restaurant in 1984. There are now over 1,000 Culver’s restaurants in 26 states, with more than 50,000 team members offering deliciously handcrafted meals and desserts. We believe that the smart, dedicated and hard-working people of Culver’s are what drives us to succeed in the restaurant industry. If you are interested in working at a Culver’s restaurant, 98% of which are independently owned and operated franchises, you may apply at www.culvers.com/careers. Also, are you interested in a franchise opportunity? We are looking for franchisees with strong leadership skills to operate Culver’s restaurants with the same high standards we’ve held since day one. If you are interested in becoming a Culver’s franchisee, please visit http://www.culvers.com/franchise. To learn more about Culver’s, visit www.culvers.com, https://www.facebook.com/culvers, https://twitter.com/culvers or https://instagram.com/culvers.

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 15,027
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yum-brands.jpeg
Yum! Brands
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culversrestaurants.jpeg
Culver's Restaurants
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yum! Brands
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Culver's Restaurants
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yum! Brands in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Culver's Restaurants in 2025.

Incident History — Yum! Brands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yum! Brands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Culver's Restaurants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Culver's Restaurants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yum-brands.jpeg
Yum! Brands
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/culversrestaurants.jpeg
Culver's Restaurants
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Culver's Restaurants company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yum! Brands company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Yum! Brands company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Culver's Restaurants company has not reported any.

In the current year, Culver's Restaurants company and Yum! Brands company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Yum! Brands company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Culver's Restaurants company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Yum! Brands company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Culver's Restaurants company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Culver's Restaurants company nor Yum! Brands company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yum! Brands company nor Culver's Restaurants company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yum! Brands nor Culver's Restaurants holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Yum! Brands company nor Culver's Restaurants company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Culver's Restaurants company employs more people globally than Yum! Brands company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Yum! Brands nor Culver's Restaurants holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yum! Brands nor Culver's Restaurants holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yum! Brands nor Culver's Restaurants holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yum! Brands nor Culver's Restaurants holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yum! Brands nor Culver's Restaurants holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yum! Brands nor Culver's Restaurants holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H