Comparison Overview

YRB Magazine

VS

Suffolk University Law Review

YRB Magazine

10011, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

YRB Magazine is a lifestyle publication that focuses on fashion, music, art, and related cultural subjects. Constantly ahead of the curve when it comes to trendsetting style, YRB connects readers with the freshest developments that impact the dynamic culture we report on. We strive to maintain a global viewpoint, looking beyond borders to find topics to inspire our readers, resulting in a magazine that is both unique and informative.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Suffolk University Law Review

120 Tremont St, 430, Boston, Massachusetts, US, 02108
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

The Suffolk University Law Review is a student-edited legal periodical published four times each year. The Law Review’s objective is to advance legal education and the legal profession through quality legal commentary and high publication standards. With this goal in mind, the Law Review strives to advance the growing reputation of Suffolk University Law School. Designed primarily as a research tool for the judiciary, practitioners, scholars, and students, the Law Review contains both professionally-authored and student-authored works. Each issue of the Suffolk University Law Review is divided between works written by professionals and students. Professional contributions are in the form of Lead Articles. Lead Articles, written by prominent jurists, legal scholars, and practitioners, vary greatly in topic and scope. Student-written works include Notes and Case Comments. A Note is an in-depth analysis of a particular field of law and usually concludes by suggesting how the courts should decide future cases or by proposing new legislation. A Case Comment describes and analyzes a recent important appellate court decision and concludes by offering opinions as to the decision’s probable impact on future cases. Law reviews are the principal medium through which new legal thought and authoritative opinion are presented to the profession. Among all the fields of graduate studies, law reviews are unique because they are edited and produced by students, with minimal faculty oversight. The policy of Suffolk University Law School, its deans, and its faculty is to delegate to the Law Review the greatest possible degree of responsibility and autonomy in connection with its publication. The Suffolk University Law Review appreciates the guidance of its faculty advisors, Professors Stephen M. McJohn and John Infranca.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
YRB Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suffolk-university-law-review.jpeg
Suffolk University Law Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
YRB Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Suffolk University Law Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for YRB Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Suffolk University Law Review in 2025.

Incident History — YRB Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

YRB Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Suffolk University Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Suffolk University Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
YRB Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/suffolk-university-law-review.jpeg
Suffolk University Law Review
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

YRB Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Suffolk University Law Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Suffolk University Law Review company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas YRB Magazine company has not reported any.

In the current year, Suffolk University Law Review company and YRB Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Suffolk University Law Review company nor YRB Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Suffolk University Law Review company has disclosed at least one data breach, while YRB Magazine company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Suffolk University Law Review company nor YRB Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither YRB Magazine company nor Suffolk University Law Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither YRB Magazine nor Suffolk University Law Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither YRB Magazine company nor Suffolk University Law Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Suffolk University Law Review company employs more people globally than YRB Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither YRB Magazine nor Suffolk University Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither YRB Magazine nor Suffolk University Law Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither YRB Magazine nor Suffolk University Law Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither YRB Magazine nor Suffolk University Law Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither YRB Magazine nor Suffolk University Law Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither YRB Magazine nor Suffolk University Law Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.