Comparison Overview

Youth Mental Health Association

VS

Care in Mind

Youth Mental Health Association

None
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

Mental health affects all of us, but not all of us understand nearly enough about mental health or mental illness. Mental illness often begins to manifest in youth in today's stressful society, and as such, youth are beginning to take leadership positions in the fight to destigmatize mental illness. However, we staunchly believe that today's youth are talented and can contribute directly to innovating solutions to problems that exist within our mental health systems, be it through community engagement, technology, or policy development. By establishing youth as innovators in this rapidly developing field of interest, we hope to create a future in which mental health can be more thoroughly destigmatized.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Care in Mind

Hope House,, Stockport, Cheshire, SK3 0UX, GB
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799

Care in Mind offers specialist mental health packages to young people aged 16-25 in residential care settings. Our innovative and evidence-based model of care aims to support young people presenting with high levels of complexity and risk in the least restrictive setting. Many of the young people we work with transition to us from inpatient settings and may have experienced numerous previous admissions and/or placement breakdowns. We can also provide an alternative to hospital admission as we are able to manage significant levels of risk safely in a least restrictive community setting. Our unique model provides 24/7 on-call and crisis intervention support, which helps us support our young people in maintaining their community placement and avoiding readmission. Each of our homes provides 4/5 placements and is staffed 24/7 by a skilled residential team, and each young person also has comprehensive wraparound support from our consultant-led mental health team. Our homes are located across three areas, Yorkshire, Cheshire & Wirral, and Lancashire, however we accept referrals from across the country. In addition to our core services, we also provide a specialised eating disorder residential service in Bolton, Lancashire.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 141
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/youth-mental-health-association.jpeg
Youth Mental Health Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/care-in-mind.jpeg
Care in Mind
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Youth Mental Health Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Care in Mind
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Youth Mental Health Association in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Care in Mind in 2026.

Incident History — Youth Mental Health Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Youth Mental Health Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Care in Mind (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Care in Mind cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/youth-mental-health-association.jpeg
Youth Mental Health Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/care-in-mind.jpeg
Care in Mind
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Care in Mind company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Youth Mental Health Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Care in Mind company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Youth Mental Health Association company.

In the current year, Care in Mind company and Youth Mental Health Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Care in Mind company nor Youth Mental Health Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Care in Mind company nor Youth Mental Health Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Care in Mind company nor Youth Mental Health Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Youth Mental Health Association company nor Care in Mind company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Youth Mental Health Association nor Care in Mind holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Youth Mental Health Association company nor Care in Mind company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Care in Mind company employs more people globally than Youth Mental Health Association company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Youth Mental Health Association nor Care in Mind holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Youth Mental Health Association nor Care in Mind holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Youth Mental Health Association nor Care in Mind holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Youth Mental Health Association nor Care in Mind holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Youth Mental Health Association nor Care in Mind holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Youth Mental Health Association nor Care in Mind holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H