Comparison Overview

Youth Justice Legal Centre

VS

Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law

Youth Justice Legal Centre

436 Essex Road, London, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

The Youth Justice Legal Centre (YJLC) is the leading source of expertise in youth justice law across England & Wales. Run by specialist youth justice lawyers, YJLC is dedicated to improving outcomes for children in conflict with the law. We provide legally accurate information, specialist training, and practical guidance to professionals working with or representing children in the youth justice system. Our services include: • Clear legal updates and resources • Tailored training for lawyers, youth justice services, and frontline professionals • An specialist legal advice line for practitioners working with children • A growing membership programme, offering exclusive resources, expert updates, and a network of committed youth justice professionals. Through our training programmes and membership community, we share best practice, build knowledge, and equip professionals with the skills and confidence to achieve the best possible outcomes for the children they support.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law

Lord & Hardaway LLP, 5335 Wisconsin Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20015, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Lord & Hardaway LLP is a premier law firm.  Our service in each of our practice areas is highly regarded.  We are not, and do not strive to be, the largest law firm measured by number of offices or lawyers.  Our goal is to be the firm of choice for clients with respect to their most challenging legal issues, most significant business transactions and most critical disputes.  Our focus has been to develop long‑term relationships with our clients, we seek always to provide excellence in client service, without regard to short‑term profit.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hardawayllp.com.jpeg
Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Youth Justice Legal Centre
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Youth Justice Legal Centre in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law in 2025.

Incident History — Youth Justice Legal Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Youth Justice Legal Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/youth-justice-legal-centre.jpeg
Youth Justice Legal Centre
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hardawayllp.com.jpeg
Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Youth Justice Legal Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Youth Justice Legal Centre company.

In the current year, Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law company and Youth Justice Legal Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law company nor Youth Justice Legal Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law company nor Youth Justice Legal Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law company nor Youth Justice Legal Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Youth Justice Legal Centre company nor Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Youth Justice Legal Centre nor Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Youth Justice Legal Centre company nor Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Youth Justice Legal Centre company employs more people globally than Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Youth Justice Legal Centre nor Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Youth Justice Legal Centre nor Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Youth Justice Legal Centre nor Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Youth Justice Legal Centre nor Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Youth Justice Legal Centre nor Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Youth Justice Legal Centre nor Lord & Hardaway LLP Attorneys at Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X