Comparison Overview

PINE (Printing Industries of New England)

VS

Goldmark Enterprises

PINE (Printing Industries of New England)

5 Crystal Pond Road, Southborough, MA , 01772, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

PINE is a member focused community-based organization dedicated to helping printers and other graphic arts companies thrive. We are obsessed with print. We honestly believe and know that print is a crucial part of the marketing supply chain. We promise that membership with us means a huge return on investment, making new friends, getting new ideas, and being a part of something bigger.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Goldmark Enterprises

549 Lafayette St N, Florissant, Missouri, 63031, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Goldmark Enterprises currently in our 28th year is a leading provider of graphic communications, combining the power to supply print, promotion and e-commerce solutions along with highly creative and strategic design capabilities. We provide brand management solutions. Our proven solutions have helped customers achieve their goals in a variety of areas by offering a broad array of printing, promotional products and related printed products and solutions, we are: • A Marketing Agency without any agency fees. • An Addition to Your Staff without being an addition to your payroll. • A Business Resource you can trust.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yourpine.jpeg
PINE (Printing Industries of New England)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldmarkent.jpeg
Goldmark Enterprises
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
PINE (Printing Industries of New England)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Goldmark Enterprises
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PINE (Printing Industries of New England) in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Goldmark Enterprises in 2025.

Incident History — PINE (Printing Industries of New England) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PINE (Printing Industries of New England) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Goldmark Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Goldmark Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yourpine.jpeg
PINE (Printing Industries of New England)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/goldmarkent.jpeg
Goldmark Enterprises
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Goldmark Enterprises company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PINE (Printing Industries of New England) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Goldmark Enterprises company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to PINE (Printing Industries of New England) company.

In the current year, Goldmark Enterprises company and PINE (Printing Industries of New England) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Goldmark Enterprises company nor PINE (Printing Industries of New England) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Goldmark Enterprises company nor PINE (Printing Industries of New England) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Goldmark Enterprises company nor PINE (Printing Industries of New England) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither PINE (Printing Industries of New England) company nor Goldmark Enterprises company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither PINE (Printing Industries of New England) nor Goldmark Enterprises holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither PINE (Printing Industries of New England) company nor Goldmark Enterprises company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PINE (Printing Industries of New England) company employs more people globally than Goldmark Enterprises company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither PINE (Printing Industries of New England) nor Goldmark Enterprises holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither PINE (Printing Industries of New England) nor Goldmark Enterprises holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither PINE (Printing Industries of New England) nor Goldmark Enterprises holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither PINE (Printing Industries of New England) nor Goldmark Enterprises holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither PINE (Printing Industries of New England) nor Goldmark Enterprises holds HIPAA certification.

Neither PINE (Printing Industries of New England) nor Goldmark Enterprises holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N