Comparison Overview

Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia

VS

SBBL Law

Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia

104 Marietta St NW, Atlanta, Georgia, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

On May 31, 1947, what is now the Young Lawyers Division of the State Bar of Georgia, commonly known as the YLD, was formed. All members of the Bar who have not yet reached their 36th birthday or who have been admitted to their first bar less than five years are automatically members. Today, the YLD is one of the most dynamic arms of the Bar, offering outreach to both the profession and to the public through various legal programs and projects.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SBBL Law

15 Ionia Ave., S.W. #520, Grand Rapids, MI, 49503, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

SBBL Law is a nationally sought-after criminal defense firm with the expertise to fiercely defend clients against the power of the government—navigating, communicating, and defending with professionalism and expertise. The firm’s criminal defense team is made up of former federal prosecutors, FBI agents, and Army JAGs with a deep understanding of the criminal justice system. SBBL’s attorneys are uniquely qualified and committed to obtaining the best possible results for their clients.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/young-lawyers-division-state-bar-of-georgia.jpeg
Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springstead-&-bartish-law-p-l-l-c-.jpeg
SBBL Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SBBL Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SBBL Law in 2025.

Incident History — Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SBBL Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SBBL Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/young-lawyers-division-state-bar-of-georgia.jpeg
Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springstead-&-bartish-law-p-l-l-c-.jpeg
SBBL Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SBBL Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SBBL Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia company.

In the current year, SBBL Law company and Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SBBL Law company nor Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SBBL Law company nor Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SBBL Law company nor Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia company nor SBBL Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia nor SBBL Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia company nor SBBL Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

SBBL Law company employs more people globally than Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia nor SBBL Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia nor SBBL Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia nor SBBL Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia nor SBBL Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia nor SBBL Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Young Lawyers Division State Bar of Georgia nor SBBL Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X