Comparison Overview

Young At Art Museum

VS

Art Gallery Of Northumberland

Young At Art Museum

8000 W. Broward Blvd,, Plantation, 33388, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.youngatartmuseum.org

Young At Art Museum fondly referred to as YAA has been a staple in Broward County since 1989. YAA's mission is to enrich our community through artistic, interactive experiences for all ages which inspire creativity and encourage an understanding of the world in which we live. The museum, located inside the Broward Mall, showcases immersive contemporary exhibits along with artmaking stations meant to create meaningful bonds between families and visitors alike. Programming such as classes, workshops, and camps, create a platform of arts for learning. Community Initiatives to low-income communities for children experiencing homelessness, at-risk teen girls, and Title I students allow for equitable and accessible art experiences. Young At Art is a 501 c3 non-profit charity and all donations are tax deductible. Support the power of art to change lives!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Art Gallery Of Northumberland

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.artgalleryofnorthumberland.com

The mandate of the Art Gallery of Northumberland is to promote and provide access to art and related programs as a community gallery for the enjoyment and education of the people of Northumberland County. We exist to serve all of Northumberland County as a public gallery. We present intellectually stimulating exhibitions and programming, as well as maintain a permanent collection of visual arts. Along with exhibitions we fulfill our mandate through educational activities which encourage active dialogue between the Gallery audience and the visual arts; including lectures, films, workshops, artist talks and tours.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/young-at-art-museum.jpeg
Young At Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/art-gallery-of-northumberland.jpeg
Art Gallery Of Northumberland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Young At Art Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Art Gallery Of Northumberland
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Young At Art Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Art Gallery Of Northumberland in 2026.

Incident History — Young At Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Young At Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Art Gallery Of Northumberland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Art Gallery Of Northumberland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/young-at-art-museum.jpeg
Young At Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/art-gallery-of-northumberland.jpeg
Art Gallery Of Northumberland
Incidents

FAQ

Young At Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Art Gallery Of Northumberland company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Art Gallery Of Northumberland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Young At Art Museum company.

In the current year, Art Gallery Of Northumberland company and Young At Art Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Art Gallery Of Northumberland company nor Young At Art Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Art Gallery Of Northumberland company nor Young At Art Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Art Gallery Of Northumberland company nor Young At Art Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Young At Art Museum company nor Art Gallery Of Northumberland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Young At Art Museum nor Art Gallery Of Northumberland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Young At Art Museum company nor Art Gallery Of Northumberland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Young At Art Museum company employs more people globally than Art Gallery Of Northumberland company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Young At Art Museum nor Art Gallery Of Northumberland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Young At Art Museum nor Art Gallery Of Northumberland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Young At Art Museum nor Art Gallery Of Northumberland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Young At Art Museum nor Art Gallery Of Northumberland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Young At Art Museum nor Art Gallery Of Northumberland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Young At Art Museum nor Art Gallery Of Northumberland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References