Comparison Overview

Yerkes Observatory

VS

Frederic Remington Art Museum

Yerkes Observatory

None
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.yerkesobservatory.org/

Restoration in progress! We're open for tours, programs, observing nights (spring, summer, fall), and an array of diverse speakers. Tickets and program info is on our website. Rising from the shoreline of Geneva Lake, Henry Ives Cobb's architectural masterpiece and the Olmsted Brothers' 50-acre slice of landscaped grandeur create a symbiosis of craftsmanship and nature. Thanks to our community for your patience during our metamorphosis. The architects, designers, and tradespeople from all walks of life have taken remarkable pride in restoring Yerkes Observatory's campus to its original 19th Century splendor while rocketing it into the 21st Century and beyond for generations to come. Watch this space!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Frederic Remington Art Museum

303 Washington Street, Ogdensburg, New York, 13669-1517, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.fredericremington.org

The only museum dedicated to artist Frederic Remington (b. October 4, 1861 - d. December 26, 1909). The Frederic Remington Art Museum houses a comprehensive collection of original Remington paintings, sketches and sculptures, as well as a broad array of personal effects and correspondence that serve to bring the artist and his vision to life. Bronze reproductions, including Remington's famous Broncho Buster, are available for sale in the museum shop. Guests not only enjoy the art work but the beautiful wood work in the historic Parish Mansion, which houses the collection.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yerkes-observatory.jpeg
Yerkes Observatory
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frederic-remington-art-museum.jpeg
Frederic Remington Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yerkes Observatory
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Frederic Remington Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yerkes Observatory in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Frederic Remington Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Yerkes Observatory (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yerkes Observatory cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Frederic Remington Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Frederic Remington Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yerkes-observatory.jpeg
Yerkes Observatory
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/frederic-remington-art-museum.jpeg
Frederic Remington Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Frederic Remington Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yerkes Observatory company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Frederic Remington Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Yerkes Observatory company.

In the current year, Frederic Remington Art Museum company and Yerkes Observatory company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Frederic Remington Art Museum company nor Yerkes Observatory company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Frederic Remington Art Museum company nor Yerkes Observatory company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Frederic Remington Art Museum company nor Yerkes Observatory company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yerkes Observatory company nor Frederic Remington Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yerkes Observatory nor Frederic Remington Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Yerkes Observatory company nor Frederic Remington Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Yerkes Observatory company employs more people globally than Frederic Remington Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Yerkes Observatory nor Frederic Remington Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yerkes Observatory nor Frederic Remington Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yerkes Observatory nor Frederic Remington Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yerkes Observatory nor Frederic Remington Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yerkes Observatory nor Frederic Remington Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yerkes Observatory nor Frederic Remington Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References