Comparison Overview

Yerevan Printing

VS

EFI

Yerevan Printing

626 W Colorado St, Glendale, CA, US, 91204
Last Update: 2025-12-17

We offer complete services from desktop publishing to printing. Whether you're looking foe onecolor printing or fullcolor. you can count on us to provide the best quailty and service avaliable. We believes that no job is ever too large or small. if you're looking for expert advice on your next project.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

EFI

12 Innovation Way, Londonderry, 03053, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

EFI is leading the transformation from analog to digital imaging with scalable, digital, award-winning products. EFI develops breakthrough technologies for the manufacturing of signage, packaging, textiles, ceramic tiles, and personalized documents, with a wide range of printers, inks, digital front ends, and a comprehensive business and production workflow suite that transforms and streamlines the entire production process, increasing your competitiveness and boosting productivity.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2,719
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yerevan-printing.jpeg
Yerevan Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/efiprint.jpeg
EFI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yerevan Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EFI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yerevan Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EFI in 2025.

Incident History — Yerevan Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yerevan Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EFI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EFI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yerevan-printing.jpeg
Yerevan Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/efiprint.jpeg
EFI
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

EFI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yerevan Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EFI company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Yerevan Printing company.

In the current year, EFI company and Yerevan Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EFI company nor Yerevan Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EFI company nor Yerevan Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EFI company nor Yerevan Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yerevan Printing company nor EFI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yerevan Printing nor EFI holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Yerevan Printing company nor EFI company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

EFI company employs more people globally than Yerevan Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Yerevan Printing nor EFI holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yerevan Printing nor EFI holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yerevan Printing nor EFI holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yerevan Printing nor EFI holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yerevan Printing nor EFI holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yerevan Printing nor EFI holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N