Comparison Overview

Yellowbrick

VS

The Armstrong Center for Hope

Yellowbrick

1560 Sherman Avenue, Suite 400, Evanston, IL, 60201, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.yellowbrickprogram.com

Yellowbrick’s mission is to serve as the national leader and resource for the psychiatric treatment of emerging adults. Yellowbrick has created a developmentally specialized, research-based clinical model that integrates cutting-edge findings from neuroscience, innovative skills based, experiential and in-depth psychotherapies, strength-based life skills and wellness medicine. Treatment is provided across all diagnoses and levels of care from residential through PHP, IOP, outpatient and home health care. When the emerging adult requires care other than office treatment… Yellowbrick offers a different approach which makes a difference in outcome: • An integrated, coherent, neuroscience research model targeting a. brain regulation, b. self-regulation skill building c. self/identity-integration • Deep TMS, neurofeedback, ReCognition cognitive enhancement, Brain hygiene • Neuro-psychoanalytic interpersonal psychotherapy 3x/week • Executive function, learning disability, life skill development • Unified arc of care; residential/PHP/IOP/Outpatient, Home health • Values: Integrity, Excellence in Innovation, Value/Outcome

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 41
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Armstrong Center for Hope

5315 HIGHGATE DR STE 102, DURHAM, North Carolina, 27713, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.armstrongcfh.com

The Armstrong Center for Hope is a group behavioral health practice where we specialize in psychological and spiritual wellness for all ages. We provide individual, couples, family, and group psychotherapy, in addition to psychological evaluation, consultation, and training. Our interdisciplinary staff of licensed professionals is available to provide quality care in a safe, confidential setting. Call us today at 919-418-1718!

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yellowbrick.jpeg
Yellowbrick
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-armstrong-center-for-hope.jpeg
The Armstrong Center for Hope
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yellowbrick
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Armstrong Center for Hope
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yellowbrick in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Armstrong Center for Hope in 2026.

Incident History — Yellowbrick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yellowbrick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Armstrong Center for Hope (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Armstrong Center for Hope cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yellowbrick.jpeg
Yellowbrick
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-armstrong-center-for-hope.jpeg
The Armstrong Center for Hope
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Armstrong Center for Hope company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yellowbrick company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Armstrong Center for Hope company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Yellowbrick company.

In the current year, The Armstrong Center for Hope company and Yellowbrick company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Armstrong Center for Hope company nor Yellowbrick company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Armstrong Center for Hope company nor Yellowbrick company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Armstrong Center for Hope company nor Yellowbrick company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yellowbrick company nor The Armstrong Center for Hope company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yellowbrick nor The Armstrong Center for Hope holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Yellowbrick company nor The Armstrong Center for Hope company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Yellowbrick company employs more people globally than The Armstrong Center for Hope company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Yellowbrick nor The Armstrong Center for Hope holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yellowbrick nor The Armstrong Center for Hope holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yellowbrick nor The Armstrong Center for Hope holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yellowbrick nor The Armstrong Center for Hope holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yellowbrick nor The Armstrong Center for Hope holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yellowbrick nor The Armstrong Center for Hope holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References