Comparison Overview

Yellow Frog Graphics

VS

Cooley Design Lab

Yellow Frog Graphics

5602 Corporate Dr, St Joseph, 64507, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Yellow Frog Graphics is a premier provider of custom vehicle graphics and wraps. We strive to provide top notch service, design, products and installation for your business, organization or personal project. Using leading edge design and installation techniques each one of our orders is tailored to customer specifications to ensure quality, accuracy and timeliness.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cooley Design Lab

None
Last Update: 2025-11-29

Founded in New York City and currently located in Maine, Cooley Design Lab is a one-person studio that specializes in book cover and interior design, as well as packaging and poster design. Recent projects include the art direction of Hard Case Crime, a publisher of hardboiled crime fiction, as well as shaping the identity of Smithsonian Folkways Recordings’ Spanish-language music packaging.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yellow-frog-graphics.jpeg
Yellow Frog Graphics
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cooley Design Lab
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yellow Frog Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cooley Design Lab
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yellow Frog Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cooley Design Lab in 2025.

Incident History — Yellow Frog Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yellow Frog Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cooley Design Lab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cooley Design Lab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yellow-frog-graphics.jpeg
Yellow Frog Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cooley Design Lab
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cooley Design Lab company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yellow Frog Graphics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cooley Design Lab company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Yellow Frog Graphics company.

In the current year, Cooley Design Lab company and Yellow Frog Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cooley Design Lab company nor Yellow Frog Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cooley Design Lab company nor Yellow Frog Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cooley Design Lab company nor Yellow Frog Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yellow Frog Graphics company nor Cooley Design Lab company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yellow Frog Graphics nor Cooley Design Lab holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Yellow Frog Graphics company nor Cooley Design Lab company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Yellow Frog Graphics company employs more people globally than Cooley Design Lab company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Yellow Frog Graphics nor Cooley Design Lab holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yellow Frog Graphics nor Cooley Design Lab holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yellow Frog Graphics nor Cooley Design Lab holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yellow Frog Graphics nor Cooley Design Lab holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yellow Frog Graphics nor Cooley Design Lab holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yellow Frog Graphics nor Cooley Design Lab holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X