Comparison Overview

Yegal - Paralegals On Demand

VS

Broomhead & Saul

Yegal - Paralegals On Demand

11-31 York St, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Established in 2016, Yegal was born from a desire to connect law firms and corporate counsel with law student paralegals for fast and flexible service. Think legal labor-hire driven by technology. Today Yegal is a national leader paralegal on-demand service in helping law companies connect with quality paralegal talent for efficient human resourcing. Connect with us now to find your best available talent FAST - www.yegal.com.au

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Broomhead & Saul

11 Hammet Street, Taunton, Somerset, TA1 1RZ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

At Broomhead & Saul we have been providing expert legal advice to a broad range of personal and business clients since 1895. Broomhead & Saul is based in offices in the heart of both Taunton and Ilminster and offers a full range of easily accessible legal services including advice on personal injury claims, children and family law issues, property, wills, trusts and estates and criminal law. Taunton Office 11 Hammet Street Taunton Somerset TA1 1RZ 01823 288121 Ilminster Office 11 & 13 East Street Ilminster Somerset TA19 0AE 01460 57056

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yegal.jpeg
Yegal - Paralegals On Demand
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broomhead-&-saul.jpeg
Broomhead & Saul
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yegal - Paralegals On Demand
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Broomhead & Saul
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yegal - Paralegals On Demand in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Broomhead & Saul in 2025.

Incident History — Yegal - Paralegals On Demand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yegal - Paralegals On Demand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Broomhead & Saul (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Broomhead & Saul cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yegal.jpeg
Yegal - Paralegals On Demand
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/broomhead-&-saul.jpeg
Broomhead & Saul
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Broomhead & Saul company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yegal - Paralegals On Demand company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Broomhead & Saul company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Yegal - Paralegals On Demand company.

In the current year, Broomhead & Saul company and Yegal - Paralegals On Demand company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Broomhead & Saul company nor Yegal - Paralegals On Demand company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Broomhead & Saul company nor Yegal - Paralegals On Demand company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Broomhead & Saul company nor Yegal - Paralegals On Demand company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yegal - Paralegals On Demand company nor Broomhead & Saul company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yegal - Paralegals On Demand nor Broomhead & Saul holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Yegal - Paralegals On Demand company nor Broomhead & Saul company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Broomhead & Saul company employs more people globally than Yegal - Paralegals On Demand company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Yegal - Paralegals On Demand nor Broomhead & Saul holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yegal - Paralegals On Demand nor Broomhead & Saul holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yegal - Paralegals On Demand nor Broomhead & Saul holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yegal - Paralegals On Demand nor Broomhead & Saul holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yegal - Paralegals On Demand nor Broomhead & Saul holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yegal - Paralegals On Demand nor Broomhead & Saul holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X