Comparison Overview

Yardley Legal Services, P.C.

VS

Big Fire Law & Policy Group

Yardley Legal Services, P.C.

301 Oxford Valley Rd., Yardley, PA, 19067, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Yardley Legal Services has been providing experienced legal representation for over 25 years. The firm, formerly known as Mead and Bane, offers complete estate planning and administration services including elder law along with real estate purchase and sale. After 25 years in the Borough of Yardley, Yardley Legal Services is now located at 603B Makefield Executive Quarters, 301 Oxford Valley Road, Yardley, PA 19067. The focus of the firm continues to be the delivery of experienced professional legal services at reasonable prices in Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Big Fire Law & Policy Group

272 Ho-Chunk Plaza, Winnebago, 68071, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Big Fire Law is a national law firm providing legal representation and advocacy in a broad range of service areas, with an emphasis in tribal law and federal Indian law. We understand the unique nature of Indian Country, which allows us to tailor our services and focus on achieving real solutions and positive outcomes for our clients. From general governmental affairs and business development to tax disputes and litigation, we have the experience and resources to truly meet the needs of our clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-fire-law.jpeg
Big Fire Law & Policy Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yardley Legal Services, P.C.
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Big Fire Law & Policy Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yardley Legal Services, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Big Fire Law & Policy Group in 2025.

Incident History — Yardley Legal Services, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yardley Legal Services, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Big Fire Law & Policy Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Big Fire Law & Policy Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yardley-legal-services-p-c-.jpeg
Yardley Legal Services, P.C.
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/big-fire-law.jpeg
Big Fire Law & Policy Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Yardley Legal Services, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Big Fire Law & Policy Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Big Fire Law & Policy Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Yardley Legal Services, P.C. company.

In the current year, Big Fire Law & Policy Group company and Yardley Legal Services, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Big Fire Law & Policy Group company nor Yardley Legal Services, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Big Fire Law & Policy Group company nor Yardley Legal Services, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Big Fire Law & Policy Group company nor Yardley Legal Services, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yardley Legal Services, P.C. company nor Big Fire Law & Policy Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yardley Legal Services, P.C. nor Big Fire Law & Policy Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Yardley Legal Services, P.C. company nor Big Fire Law & Policy Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Big Fire Law & Policy Group company employs more people globally than Yardley Legal Services, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Yardley Legal Services, P.C. nor Big Fire Law & Policy Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yardley Legal Services, P.C. nor Big Fire Law & Policy Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yardley Legal Services, P.C. nor Big Fire Law & Policy Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yardley Legal Services, P.C. nor Big Fire Law & Policy Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yardley Legal Services, P.C. nor Big Fire Law & Policy Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yardley Legal Services, P.C. nor Big Fire Law & Policy Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X