Comparison Overview

Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司)

VS

Kerry

Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司)

18 Road, Yuhua Economic Zone, 18, Nanjing, Jiangsu province, CN, 210000
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Located in China’s capital of spirits—Suqian, Yanghe Distillery boasts total assets over RMB 35.4 billion. With more than 30,000 employees, we have opened 179 branch companies and offices across the country. Our center of domestic operations is based in China’s ancient capital, Nanjing. The group owns two subsidiary brands Yanghe and Shuanggou, both of which have over 1,300 years of history. Our three production bases—Yanghe, Shuanggou and Lai’an have a total area of over ten square kilometers, made us one of the largest and most powerful liquor producers in the country. After consecutively making the list of the top 500 China’s enterprises, we surged into the FT Global 500 list in 2013. Driven by powerful customer satisfaction and demand, in 2015, our sales income reached over RMB 15 billion, ranked No.2 in the nation. Moreover, with a total value of USD 2.0 billion, we also made the BrandZ listing of the top 100 most valuable China’s brands, and we were ranked 55th on Hurun's 2016 list of the 200 most valuable Chinese brands, achieving first place among all the listed brands from Jiangsu Province. In 2017, we were ranked 3th in the global top 50 spirits list, which were released by Brand Finance, a British leading independent brand valuation organization.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kerry

Naas, IE
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Every day, millions of people throughout the world consume foods and beverages containing Kerry’s taste and nutrition solutions. We are committed to making the world of food and beverage better for everyone, and dedicated to our Purpose, Inspiring Food, Nourishing Life. At Kerry, we are proud to provide our customers – some of the world’s best-known food, beverage and pharma brands – with the expertise, insights and know-how they need to deliver products that people enjoy and feel better about consuming. Kerry is a company rich in heritage and resources. Over the past five decades, our focus on changing lifestyles, the globalisation of food tastes and ever-evolving consumer needs has brought us to a market-leading global position. Today, we are firmly established as a world leader in the food, beverage and pharma industries, with 22,000+ staff and 150+ innovation and manufacturing centres across 30+ countries. Learn more about Kerry: www.kerry.com

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 16,483
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yanghedistillery.jpeg
Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kerry.jpeg
Kerry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kerry
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kerry in 2025.

Incident History — Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kerry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kerry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yanghedistillery.jpeg
Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kerry.jpeg
Kerry
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) company and Kerry company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Kerry company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) company.

In the current year, Kerry company and Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kerry company nor Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kerry company nor Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kerry company nor Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) company nor Kerry company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) nor Kerry holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kerry company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) company.

Kerry company employs more people globally than Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) nor Kerry holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) nor Kerry holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) nor Kerry holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) nor Kerry holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) nor Kerry holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yanghe Distillery (江苏洋河酒厂股份有限公司) nor Kerry holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H