Comparison Overview

Yandex

VS

Cimpress

Yandex

Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://company.yandex.com

Yandex is a technology company that builds intelligent products and services powered by machine learning. Our goal is to help consumers and businesses better navigate the online and offline world. Since 1997, we have delivered world-class, locally relevant search and information services. Additionally, we have developed market-leading on-demand transportation services, navigation products, and other mobile applications for millions of consumers across the globe. Yandex, which has 34 offices worldwide, has been listed on the NASDAQ since 2011.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 8,834
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Cimpress

Xerox Technology Park, Dundalk, County Louth, A91 H9N9, IE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://cimpress.com/

Cimpress plc (Nasdaq: CMPR) invests in and builds customer-focused, entrepreneurial, mass-customization businesses for the long term. Mass customization is a competitive strategy which seeks to produce goods and services to meet individual customer needs with near mass production efficiency. Cimpress is a strategically-focused group of more than a dozen businesses, each operating in a largely autonomous manner other than as it relates to the select few shared strategic and corporate activities that we maintain centrally. Cimpress businesses include Drukwerkdeal, Exaprint, National Pen, Pixartprinting, Printi, Vistaprint and WIRmachenDRUCK. Founded by Robert Keane, who remains President & CEO today, the company has been passionate about empowering people to make an impression through individually meaningful, personalized physical products for more than 20 years. To learn more, visit http://www.cimpress.com.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 11,485
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yandex.jpeg
Yandex
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cimpress.jpeg
Cimpress
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yandex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cimpress
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yandex in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cimpress in 2025.

Incident History — Yandex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yandex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cimpress (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cimpress cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yandex.jpeg
Yandex
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Android Spyware
Motivation: Cyberespionage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Motivation: Unknown
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2022
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cimpress.jpeg
Cimpress
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cimpress company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yandex company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Yandex company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Cimpress company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cimpress company and Yandex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cimpress company nor Yandex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Yandex company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Cimpress company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Cimpress company nor Yandex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yandex company nor Cimpress company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yandex nor Cimpress holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cimpress company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Yandex company.

Cimpress company employs more people globally than Yandex company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Neither Yandex nor Cimpress holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yandex nor Cimpress holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yandex nor Cimpress holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yandex nor Cimpress holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yandex nor Cimpress holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yandex nor Cimpress holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References