Comparison Overview

Yale Foreign Policy Initiative

VS

AnyThink

Yale Foreign Policy Initiative

New Haven, Connecticut, US, 06520
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://yalefpi.com/

The Yale Foreign Policy Initiative (YFPI) is a student-run nonprofit dedicated to the creation of comprehensive and research-backed solutions to tackle the world’s leading foreign affairs issues. Partnering with think tanks, government agencies, and the Jackson School in pursuit of policy research, YFPI seeks to prepare generations of Yale undergraduates for careers in foreign service and international relations.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

AnyThink

112-D, Off Khalid bin Waleed Road PECHS Block II, Karachi, Sindh, PK, 75400
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 750 and 799
http://www.anythinkmedia.com

ANYTHINK MEDIA, code-named ATM, is an all-under-one-roof entity, doing 360 degree advertising, brand management, brand development and integrated business communications. It’s a round-the-clock ideas bank where you can deposit your thoughts and draw inspirations — as, how and when you like. Of course, we guarantee exponential growth and profitability for whatever you may like to think — because it is here that we grow simple thoughts into big ideas.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yalefpi.jpeg
Yale Foreign Policy Initiative
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anythink.jpeg
AnyThink
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yale Foreign Policy Initiative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AnyThink
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yale Foreign Policy Initiative in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AnyThink in 2025.

Incident History — Yale Foreign Policy Initiative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yale Foreign Policy Initiative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AnyThink (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AnyThink cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yalefpi.jpeg
Yale Foreign Policy Initiative
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anythink.jpeg
AnyThink
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AnyThink company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yale Foreign Policy Initiative company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AnyThink company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Yale Foreign Policy Initiative company.

In the current year, AnyThink company and Yale Foreign Policy Initiative company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AnyThink company nor Yale Foreign Policy Initiative company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AnyThink company nor Yale Foreign Policy Initiative company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AnyThink company nor Yale Foreign Policy Initiative company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yale Foreign Policy Initiative company nor AnyThink company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yale Foreign Policy Initiative nor AnyThink holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Yale Foreign Policy Initiative company nor AnyThink company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AnyThink company employs more people globally than Yale Foreign Policy Initiative company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Yale Foreign Policy Initiative nor AnyThink holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yale Foreign Policy Initiative nor AnyThink holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yale Foreign Policy Initiative nor AnyThink holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yale Foreign Policy Initiative nor AnyThink holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yale Foreign Policy Initiative nor AnyThink holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yale Foreign Policy Initiative nor AnyThink holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Published
Date
2025-12-04
Updated
Date
2025-12-04
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References