Comparison Overview

Yahoo

VS

[24]7.ai

Yahoo

770 Broadway, New York, NY, US, 10003
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749

Yahoo serves as a trusted guide for hundreds of millions of people globally, helping them achieve their goals online through our portfolio of iconic products. To learn more about Yahoo, please visit yahooinc.com.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 9,513
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
1

[24]7.ai

2105 S Bascom Ave, Campbell, California, US, 95008
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

[24]7.ai™ customer engagement solutions use conversational artificial intelligence to understand customer intent, enabling companies to create personalized, predictive, and effortless customer experiences across all channels; attract and retain customers; boost agent productivity and satisfaction; and drive revenues while lowering costs. The world’s largest and most recognizable brands use [24]7.ai intent-driven technologies to serve several hundred million visitors through billions of conversations annually, most of which are automated. The result is an order of magnitude improvement in digital adoption, customer satisfaction, and revenue growth. For more information, visit: www.247.ai. [24]7.ai is based in Campbell, California. [24]7.ai is a registered trademark of 24/7 Customer, Inc.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 11,036
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yahoo.jpeg
Yahoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/24-7-ai.jpeg
[24]7.ai
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Yahoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
[24]7.ai
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Yahoo in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for [24]7.ai in 2025.

Incident History — Yahoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Yahoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — [24]7.ai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

[24]7.ai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/yahoo.jpeg
Yahoo
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 03/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Cookie Manipulation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Cookie Manipulation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/24-7-ai.jpeg
[24]7.ai
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

[24]7.ai company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Yahoo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Yahoo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas [24]7.ai company has not reported any.

In the current year, Yahoo company has reported more cyber incidents than [24]7.ai company.

Neither [24]7.ai company nor Yahoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Yahoo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other [24]7.ai company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither [24]7.ai company nor Yahoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Yahoo company nor [24]7.ai company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Yahoo nor [24]7.ai holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Yahoo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to [24]7.ai company.

[24]7.ai company employs more people globally than Yahoo company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Yahoo nor [24]7.ai holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Yahoo nor [24]7.ai holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Yahoo nor [24]7.ai holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Yahoo nor [24]7.ai holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Yahoo nor [24]7.ai holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Yahoo nor [24]7.ai holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N