Comparison Overview

XS Brokers

VS

Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc.

XS Brokers

13 Temple St, Quincy, MA, 02169, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://xsbrokers.com

XS Brokers is an independent wholesale brokerage facility that has been creatively solving hard-to-place insurance risks since 1978. With unmatched product availability, powerful market knowledge and unparalleled underwriting expertise – there’s virtually no class of business we cannot write. With over 40 years in the industry, the strength of our carrier relationships ensures unrivaled market access. Our goal is simple: to better understand our clients’ needs in order to provide customized solutions that help you achieve your business goals. Quick Facts: • Family-owned firm providing comprehensive property and casualty insurance solutions. • Represents more than 50 admitted and approved markets and over 175 Carriers. • Binding authority for 15+ markets. • Locations in Quincy, MA, Hartford, CT, Conshocken, PA, Tampa, FL, Atlanta, GA and Montpelier, Vermont.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 189
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc.

6107 Blue Ridge Blvd, None, Raytown, Missouri, US, 64133
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.anchorinsurancekc.com/

Receive financial security in every aspect of your life with Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. of Raytown, Missouri. As a full-service brokerage firm we offer home, auto, business, health, and life insurance to ensure you are always protected. With more than 15 years of experience, our professionals are dedicated to providing the highest quality coverage and personal service for every client. We give you our commitment to finding the most competitive prices through the markets we have available in our agency. Contact our insurance brokerage today for our protective, customized policies.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xsbrokers.jpeg
XS Brokers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anchor-insurance-agency-kc.jpeg
Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
XS Brokers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for XS Brokers in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — XS Brokers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XS Brokers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xsbrokers.jpeg
XS Brokers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anchor-insurance-agency-kc.jpeg
Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to XS Brokers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to XS Brokers company.

In the current year, Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. company and XS Brokers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. company nor XS Brokers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. company nor XS Brokers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. company nor XS Brokers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither XS Brokers company nor Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither XS Brokers nor Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither XS Brokers company nor Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

XS Brokers company employs more people globally than Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.

Neither XS Brokers nor Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither XS Brokers nor Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither XS Brokers nor Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither XS Brokers nor Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither XS Brokers nor Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither XS Brokers nor Anchor Insurance Agency, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References