Comparison Overview

Xquisit Communications

VS

Logoworks

Xquisit Communications

83 Little Bridge Street, Almonte, K0A 1A0, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

We are a graphic design, creative consulting and web development company with a passion for unparalleled design and an integrity-based approach to business. We develop brands, promote messages and design visual communications. Our team consists of a friendly, energetic and talented group of designers, developers and creative collaborators. Since opening in 2006, we have worked with a wide range of clients in Canada and beyond, earning an excellent reputation for providing high-quality deliverables through our honest, personable approach. We’ll make you look sharp.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Logoworks

314 Two Lakes Trail, New Bern, 28560, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

As a premier creative graphic design and marketing design service located in the US, our sole mission revolves around enhancing your brands visual appeal. That means giving you custom design that’s affordable, fast, and hassle-free. Since 2001, our team of expert graphic designers have consistently impressed our clients with designs that perfectly capture their vision.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2,100
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xquisit-communications.jpeg
Xquisit Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/logoworks.jpeg
Logoworks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Xquisit Communications
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Logoworks
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xquisit Communications in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Logoworks in 2025.

Incident History — Xquisit Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xquisit Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Logoworks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Logoworks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xquisit-communications.jpeg
Xquisit Communications
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/logoworks.jpeg
Logoworks
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Logoworks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Xquisit Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Logoworks company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Xquisit Communications company.

In the current year, Logoworks company and Xquisit Communications company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Logoworks company nor Xquisit Communications company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Logoworks company nor Xquisit Communications company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Logoworks company nor Xquisit Communications company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Xquisit Communications company nor Logoworks company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Xquisit Communications nor Logoworks holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Xquisit Communications company nor Logoworks company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Logoworks company employs more people globally than Xquisit Communications company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Xquisit Communications nor Logoworks holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Xquisit Communications nor Logoworks holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Xquisit Communications nor Logoworks holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Xquisit Communications nor Logoworks holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Xquisit Communications nor Logoworks holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Xquisit Communications nor Logoworks holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X