Comparison Overview

XPO

VS

Exolgan Container Terminal

XPO

Five American Lane, Greenwich, CT, US, 06831
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

XPO provides world-class transportation solutions to the most successful companies in the world. We have a high-energy team around the globe focused on being the best in the industry. Given the scope of our business, there are opportunities to do satisfying work in many different fields, and at all levels of experience. If you’re ready to move the world forward, we’d like to invest in you. (NYSE: XPO)

NAICS: 484
NAICS Definition: Truck Transportation
Employees: 31,620
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Exolgan Container Terminal

Manuel Alberti 1780 Dock Sud, Buenos Aires 1871, AR
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

EXOLGAN, es la mayor Terminal de Contenedores de la República Argentina. Ubicada en Dock Sud, Avellaneda, sobre un predio de 50 hectáreas y con 1.200 mts lineales de muelle, es el principal operador en el Comercio Exterior de la carga Containerizada que ingresa y egresa de nuestro País. El servicio que presta EXOLGAN se diferencia fuertemente en el mercado en base a su avance tecnológico, la eficiencia de sus procesos, la productividad operativa y la calidad y cantidad de su equipamiento. En nuestra Terminal operan las principales líneas marítimas del mundo con servicios regulares a la Costa Este de América, Golfo de México, Europa y Oriente. Nuestra ubicación es estratégica, fuera de la Capital Federal, porque tiene diferentes vías de acceso rápido que agilizan el tránsito de camiones y reducen el alto congestionamiento urbano propio de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires.

NAICS: 484
NAICS Definition: Truck Transportation
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xpologistics.jpeg
XPO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exolgan-container-terminal.jpeg
Exolgan Container Terminal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
XPO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Exolgan Container Terminal
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for XPO in 2025.

Incidents vs Truck Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exolgan Container Terminal in 2025.

Incident History — XPO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XPO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Exolgan Container Terminal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exolgan Container Terminal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xpologistics.jpeg
XPO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exolgan-container-terminal.jpeg
Exolgan Container Terminal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

XPO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Exolgan Container Terminal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Exolgan Container Terminal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to XPO company.

In the current year, Exolgan Container Terminal company and XPO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Exolgan Container Terminal company nor XPO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Exolgan Container Terminal company nor XPO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Exolgan Container Terminal company nor XPO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither XPO company nor Exolgan Container Terminal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither XPO nor Exolgan Container Terminal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

XPO company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Exolgan Container Terminal company.

XPO company employs more people globally than Exolgan Container Terminal company, reflecting its scale as a Truck Transportation.

Neither XPO nor Exolgan Container Terminal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither XPO nor Exolgan Container Terminal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither XPO nor Exolgan Container Terminal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither XPO nor Exolgan Container Terminal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither XPO nor Exolgan Container Terminal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither XPO nor Exolgan Container Terminal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X