Comparison Overview

XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY

VS

Glasser Images

XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY

Paso Robles Ave, Van Nuys, CA, 91406, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799

XO and Fetti Photography documents love for the wildly romantic, believers in magic, soulmates and true love. Combining fine art styles with a documentary approach, we are dedicated to expertly capturing the unforgettable moments of your unique fairytale. XO and Fetti believes in building relaxed, comfortable photography sessions for every client so that each shot is authentic and natural. We do this by valuing the individuality of our clients, getting to know both their personalities and their story before the camera ever steps into the picture.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Glasser Images

510 East Main Ave, Bismarck, 58501, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Founded by Jack Glasser in 2005 with the taking of one senior graduation portrait, Glasser Images has grown and continues to grow into the future. This is driven by Jack’s passion for photography and entrepreneurship as well as his vision for the company. The goal of Glasser Images is to provide outstanding, personalized service and create quality and creative photography that captures personality. With a fresh, new, and modern perspective to photography, Glasser Images creates and captures unique images. Whether in need of wedding photography, senior graduation pictures, family photos, or commercial photography, Glasser Images has a simple style and approach with one common goal - great photography.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xo-and-fetti-photography.jpeg
XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glasser-images.jpeg
Glasser Images
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glasser Images
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Glasser Images in 2025.

Incident History — XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Glasser Images (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Glasser Images cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xo-and-fetti-photography.jpeg
XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/glasser-images.jpeg
Glasser Images
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Glasser Images company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Glasser Images company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY company.

In the current year, Glasser Images company and XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Glasser Images company nor XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Glasser Images company nor XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Glasser Images company nor XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY company nor Glasser Images company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY nor Glasser Images holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY company nor Glasser Images company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Glasser Images company employs more people globally than XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY nor Glasser Images holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY nor Glasser Images holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY nor Glasser Images holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY nor Glasser Images holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY nor Glasser Images holds HIPAA certification.

Neither XO AND FETTI PHOTOGRAPHY nor Glasser Images holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N