Comparison Overview

Xingtera

VS

Muunqi

Xingtera

5201 Great America Parkway, Siute 309, Santa Clara, CA, United States, 95054, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95054
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Xingtera, having two offices located at Silicon Valley, California and Pudong Hitech Zone, Shanghai, was founded in the year of 2010. We started as a semiconductor company focusing on developing ITU-T G.hn technology and providing broadband PLC solutions for home networking. Coming with the trend of digitalization of the world, we have gradually transformed ourselves into a leading-edge technology company specializing in the development and sale of industrial IoT products and solutions. Our core focus areas include AI+5G and broadband PLC products and solutions. With a team of experienced and talented engineers, we are committed to delivering high-performance, reliable, and scalable products and solutions to our customers across various industries. What sets Xingtera apart is our unwavering commitment to innovation, quality, and customer satisfaction. We strive to stay ahead of the curve by continuously exploring emerging technologies, investing in R&D, and forging strategic partnerships with industry leaders. Xingtera is more than just a technology company; we are partners in the successes of both our customers and vendors, working collaboratively to harness the full potential of the industrial IoT ecosystem. Through innovation, integrity, and excellence, we are committed to making a meaningful and lasting impact in the digital age. At Xingtera, we make the Industrial IoT simple!

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Muunqi

2451 Cumberland Pkwy SE, Atlanta, 30339, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Muunqi is an open source software business that is a 'force multiplier' of software teams & infrastructure to enable high performance networks. We enable existing software teams to use hardware accelerators without the need for any specialized FPGA hardware skills. Customers can use these accelerators to improve their network performance by 2x to over 50x.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xingtera.jpeg
Xingtera
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muunqi.jpeg
Muunqi
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Xingtera
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Muunqi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xingtera in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Muunqi in 2025.

Incident History — Xingtera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xingtera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Muunqi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Muunqi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xingtera.jpeg
Xingtera
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muunqi.jpeg
Muunqi
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Muunqi company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Xingtera company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Muunqi company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Xingtera company.

In the current year, Muunqi company and Xingtera company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Muunqi company nor Xingtera company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Muunqi company nor Xingtera company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Muunqi company nor Xingtera company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Xingtera company nor Muunqi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Xingtera nor Muunqi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Xingtera company nor Muunqi company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Xingtera nor Muunqi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Xingtera nor Muunqi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Xingtera nor Muunqi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Xingtera nor Muunqi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Xingtera nor Muunqi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Xingtera nor Muunqi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.