Comparison Overview

Xcel Energy

VS

Duke Energy Corporation

Xcel Energy

401 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849

A leading energy provider, dedicated to excellence. We make energy work better for our customers, helping them thrive every day. That means always raising the bar - delivering better service and providing more reliable, resilient and sustainable energy to the eight states we serve: Minnesota, Colorado, Wisconsin, Michigan, North Dakota, South Dakota, New Mexico and Texas. At Xcel Energy, we provide work that makes a difference, a team you can count on, opportunities to grow and rewards that help you thrive. Ready to help power the future of energy? Visit jobs.xcelenergy.com to learn more.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 11,741
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Duke Energy Corporation

525 S Tryon St, Charlotte, 28202, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849

Duke Energy, a Fortune 150 company headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., is one of America’s largest energy holding companies. The company’s electric utilities serve 8.4 million customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky, and collectively own 54,800 megawatts of energy capacity. Its natural gas utilities serve 1.7 million customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio and Kentucky. Duke Energy is executing an ambitious clean energy transition, keeping reliability, affordability and accessibility at the forefront as the company works toward net-zero methane emissions from its natural gas business by 2030 and net-zero carbon emissions from electricity generation by 2050. The company is investing in major electric grid upgrades and cleaner generation, including expanded energy storage, renewables, natural gas and nuclear. Our team is available Monday to Friday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. EST. If you suspect an emergency, please call 911.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 25,252
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xcel-energy.jpeg
Xcel Energy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duke-energy-corporation.jpeg
Duke Energy Corporation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Xcel Energy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Duke Energy Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xcel Energy in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Duke Energy Corporation in 2026.

Incident History — Xcel Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xcel Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Duke Energy Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Duke Energy Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xcel-energy.jpeg
Xcel Energy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duke-energy-corporation.jpeg
Duke Energy Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Strategic dependencies and potential exploitation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Duke Energy Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Xcel Energy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Duke Energy Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Xcel Energy company has not reported any.

In the current year, Duke Energy Corporation company and Xcel Energy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Duke Energy Corporation company nor Xcel Energy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Duke Energy Corporation company nor Xcel Energy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Duke Energy Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Xcel Energy company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Xcel Energy company nor Duke Energy Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Duke Energy Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Duke Energy Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Xcel Energy company.

Duke Energy Corporation company employs more people globally than Xcel Energy company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Duke Energy Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Duke Energy Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Duke Energy Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Duke Energy Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Duke Energy Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Xcel Energy nor Duke Energy Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.