Comparison Overview

X-Cel Technologies, Inc.

VS

Pulsair Systems, Inc.

X-Cel Technologies, Inc.

7800 Graphics Drive, Tinley Park, 60477, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.xcelcnc.com/

Our 40,000 square foot CNC facility features an arsenal of precision equipment to tackle the high volume milling demands of today's market. We specialize in tight tolerance precision machining. Located in the Southwest Suburbs of Chicago, X-Cel is your manufacturing solution with our 4 and 5 axis milling, state of the art equipment and cutting edge software.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Pulsair Systems, Inc.

13643 NE 126th Pl, Kirkland, Washington, 98034, US
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 750 and 799
https://www.pulsair.com

Pulsair Systems builds powerful liquid mixing and blending systems that improve tank utilization, promote faster mixing, improve operation efficiency and reduce maintenance costs. Many customers have see up to 95% improvements in energy saving after switching from mechanical mixers and air spargers. Our vertical mixing process is suitable for any tank size or any number of tanks. The Pulsair mixing process mixes 100% of the tank's contents at any liquid level. Pulsair's air mixing solutions are available in a wide range of models and configuration designed to meet a variety of mixing and blending requirements. It is the versatility, durability and dependability of Pulsair's liquid mixing systems that so many companies worldwide have come to rely on for their mixing solutions. Pulsair's air mixing solutions are successfully used in a variety of industries such as petroleum & lubrication, wastewater mixing, chemical mixing, paint mixing, slurry, rail tanker cars, food & beverages, wine cap management, diving bubbler systems and much more.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/x-cel-technologies-inc.jpeg
X-Cel Technologies, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulsair-systems.jpeg
Pulsair Systems, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
X-Cel Technologies, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pulsair Systems, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for X-Cel Technologies, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pulsair Systems, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — X-Cel Technologies, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

X-Cel Technologies, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pulsair Systems, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pulsair Systems, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/x-cel-technologies-inc.jpeg
X-Cel Technologies, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pulsair-systems.jpeg
Pulsair Systems, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company and Pulsair Systems, Inc. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Pulsair Systems, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company.

In the current year, Pulsair Systems, Inc. company and X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pulsair Systems, Inc. company nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pulsair Systems, Inc. company nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pulsair Systems, Inc. company nor X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company nor Pulsair Systems, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. nor Pulsair Systems, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company nor Pulsair Systems, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

X-Cel Technologies, Inc. company employs more people globally than Pulsair Systems, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. nor Pulsair Systems, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. nor Pulsair Systems, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. nor Pulsair Systems, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. nor Pulsair Systems, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. nor Pulsair Systems, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither X-Cel Technologies, Inc. nor Pulsair Systems, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References