Comparison Overview

Wynne-Jones IP

VS

Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company

Wynne-Jones IP

Essex Place, 22 Rodney Road, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, GL50 1JJ, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

As a leading firm of Patent and Trade Mark attorneys Wynne-Jones excels in the provision of IP consultancy by means of a personally tailored service that identifies and satisfies individual client needs. A client focused approach, teamed with a proactive & responsive business ethos are what set the firm apart from the rest, allowing us to develop an excellent reputation locally, nationally and internationally. The firm has a broad client base which includes leading multinationals, universities, government organizations, SMEs and individuals. As well as being actively involved in obtaining and enforcing Intellectual Property Rights in the UK, we have an extensive overseas network of selected Attorney Associates, through whom we file, prosecute and enforce Patents, Trade Marks and Registered Designs worldwide. Our services include: International protection, maintenance and renewal of IP rights, IP portfolio audits and management, IP acquisition services, domain name disputes, searching and watching services, and the resolution of IP disputes. They cover the entire life cycle of IP, from the birth of an idea, technology or brand, through maintenance and enforcement, to commercialization, whether this be in the UK, Europe or worldwide. We can also offer advice regarding UK tax incentive schemes such as R&D Tax Credits and the Patent Box. We provide a personal level of service for each client matched to their particular needs. This may take the form of being on call whenever required for immediate advice, or adopting a more 'hands on'​ approach with more integration into a company's internal operations, for example by attending in-house meetings, conducting IP and technology audits or providing training sessions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company

111 Monument Circle, Indianapolis, Indiana, 46204, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Connor Reporting has a long history of providing our clients the services of accurate and professional court reporters whether in Indianapolis, throughout Indiana, or nationwide. Connor Reporting has become the recognized leader in court reporting, legal videography, technology, and video conferencing services. We pride ourselves in our ability to adapt and react, on the fly, to our client demands. Whether you’re taking a deposition down the street or around the country, Connor Reporting will ensure that your time is spent focused on your case, not logistics.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wynne-jones-lain-&-james-llp.jpeg
Wynne-Jones IP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connor-reporting.jpeg
Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wynne-Jones IP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wynne-Jones IP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company in 2025.

Incident History — Wynne-Jones IP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wynne-Jones IP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wynne-jones-lain-&-james-llp.jpeg
Wynne-Jones IP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connor-reporting.jpeg
Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wynne-Jones IP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wynne-Jones IP company.

In the current year, Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company company and Wynne-Jones IP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company company nor Wynne-Jones IP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company company nor Wynne-Jones IP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company company nor Wynne-Jones IP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wynne-Jones IP company nor Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wynne-Jones IP nor Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wynne-Jones IP company nor Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wynne-Jones IP company employs more people globally than Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Wynne-Jones IP nor Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wynne-Jones IP nor Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wynne-Jones IP nor Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wynne-Jones IP nor Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wynne-Jones IP nor Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wynne-Jones IP nor Connor Reporting, A Veritext Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X