Comparison Overview

Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm

VS

Western Australian Museum

Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm

Wyck Association, Philadelphia, 19144, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Welcome to Wyck, a National Historic Landmark in the heart of the historic Germantown neighborhood of Philadelphia. Wyck served as the ancestral home to one Germantown family, the Wistar-Haines, from 1690 to 1973. Here, traditional Quaker culture blended with a passion for innovation. The people who lived and worked at Wyck expressed these values through their commitment to education, horticulture, natural history, and preservation. Wyck connects this family and its rich history to our community today through educational, often experiential programs that focus on local history, horticulture, urban agriculture, and heritage conservation, using the past as inspiration for the future.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Western Australian Museum

Perth Cultural Centre, James Street Perth , Perth , 6000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The Western Australian Museum was established in 1891 (as the ‘Perth Museum’) and its initial collections were of geological, ethnological and biological specimens. Indeed, it can claim to be one of the oldest scientific institutions in the State. In 1959, its botanical collection was transferred to the new Herbarium and it continued to concentrate on earth sciences and zoology. The 1960s and 1970s saw the addition of responsibility for developing and maintaining the State’s anthropological, archaeological, maritime archaeological and social and cultural history collections. The Museum’s aim is to advocate knowledge about the collections and communicate it to the public through a variety of media, but particularly through a program of exhibitions and publications. Keep our online community safe and respectful by following our community guidelines: https://visit.museum.wa.gov.au/social-media-community-guidelines

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 270
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wyck-historic-house-garden-and-farm.jpeg
Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/western-australian-museum.jpeg
Western Australian Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Western Australian Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Western Australian Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Western Australian Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Western Australian Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wyck-historic-house-garden-and-farm.jpeg
Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/western-australian-museum.jpeg
Western Australian Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Western Australian Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Western Australian Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company.

In the current year, Western Australian Museum company and Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Western Australian Museum company nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Western Australian Museum company nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Western Australian Museum company nor Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company nor Western Australian Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm nor Western Australian Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company nor Western Australian Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Western Australian Museum company employs more people globally than Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm nor Western Australian Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm nor Western Australian Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm nor Western Australian Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm nor Western Australian Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm nor Western Australian Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wyck Historic House, Garden and Farm nor Western Australian Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X