Comparison Overview

Würth Bulgaria

VS

Dave Bland Engineering

Würth Bulgaria

ул. Манастирска Воденица №53, София, undefined, 1186, BG
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Würth България е основана през 1993-та година, като част от немския концерн Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG, глобален лидер в снабдяването на професионалисти в областта на производството, строителството и монтажа. В световен мащаб Würth Group оперира в над 84 страни, през повече от 400 компании. Научете защо над 3.6 милиона професионалисти по цял свят и над 15 хиляди клиенти на територията на България избират продукти с качеството на Würth. *** Würth Bulgaria was founded in 1993 as part of the German group Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG, a global leader in supplying professionals in manufacturing, construction, and assembly. Globally, the Würth Group operates in over 84 countries through more than 400 companies. Discover why over 3.6 million professionals worldwide and over 15,000 customers in Bulgaria choose Würth products for their quality and reliability.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 66
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dave Bland Engineering

Full Sutton Ind Est, York, Yorkshire YO41 1HS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Dave Bland Engineering ltd, manufacturers of Recovery Vehicles and Equipment,is a long established company founded on the principles of quality engineering innovative design, and excellent customer service, Our busness is based upon quality and service. We aim to provide a range of products to meet our customers' demands and expectations within the industry (backed up by our excellent after sales service!). Our customers trust and rely upon quality advice and informed product knowledge, all from a single point of contact.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wurth-bulgaria-gmbh-&-co-kg.jpeg
Würth Bulgaria
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dave-bland-engineering.jpeg
Dave Bland Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Würth Bulgaria
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dave Bland Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Würth Bulgaria in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dave Bland Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Würth Bulgaria (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Würth Bulgaria cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dave Bland Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dave Bland Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wurth-bulgaria-gmbh-&-co-kg.jpeg
Würth Bulgaria
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dave-bland-engineering.jpeg
Dave Bland Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Würth Bulgaria company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dave Bland Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dave Bland Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Würth Bulgaria company.

In the current year, Dave Bland Engineering company and Würth Bulgaria company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering company nor Würth Bulgaria company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering company nor Würth Bulgaria company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dave Bland Engineering company nor Würth Bulgaria company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Würth Bulgaria company nor Dave Bland Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Würth Bulgaria nor Dave Bland Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Würth Bulgaria company nor Dave Bland Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Würth Bulgaria company employs more people globally than Dave Bland Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Würth Bulgaria nor Dave Bland Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Würth Bulgaria nor Dave Bland Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Würth Bulgaria nor Dave Bland Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Würth Bulgaria nor Dave Bland Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Würth Bulgaria nor Dave Bland Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Würth Bulgaria nor Dave Bland Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H