Comparison Overview

Wright Business Graphics

VS

PEP the Printers

Wright Business Graphics

US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://wrightbg.com/

Wright Enterprises, headquartered in Portland, Oregon, was founded in 1970 as Wright Business Forms, a business forms printing company dedicated to partnering with distributors. Initially a two-employee shop providing unit set forms, Wright's has grown to a five-division, widely-diversified, all inclusive printing company. We offer products ranging from continuous and unit set forms to complex custom commercial projects to variable digital and fulfillment services. Today Wright Enterprises has more than 328 employees and has manufacturing facilities in Portland, Oregon; Kent, Washington; and Los Angeles, California. We are the West Coast's leading supplier of printed products.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 104
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

PEP the Printers

Unit 5 Phoenix Court, Rustington, West Sussex, BN16 3HQ, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pep4print.co.uk

Here at Pep the Printers we have over 41 years of experience in ‘Perfecting Every Print’ so we know a thing or two about delivering high-quality products, competitive prices, and great customer service. We are an experienced team of print consultants and designers offering a wide range of services including copying, printing, and graphic design. So whether you need a small order of business cards or 10,000 brochures, we treat every job with the same care and attention, which is why we have been voted the “most loved” printers in Sussex for the fifth year running! Thank you to everyone who voted from all of the PEP team. Contact us Phone: 01903 53 53 53 Email: [email protected], Website: pep4print.co.uk Facebook: PEP the Printers Instagram: @pep4print Twitter: @pep4print

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wright-business-graphics.jpeg
Wright Business Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pep-the-printers.jpeg
PEP the Printers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wright Business Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PEP the Printers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wright Business Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PEP the Printers in 2025.

Incident History — Wright Business Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wright Business Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PEP the Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PEP the Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wright-business-graphics.jpeg
Wright Business Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pep-the-printers.jpeg
PEP the Printers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wright Business Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PEP the Printers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PEP the Printers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wright Business Graphics company.

In the current year, PEP the Printers company and Wright Business Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PEP the Printers company nor Wright Business Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PEP the Printers company nor Wright Business Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PEP the Printers company nor Wright Business Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wright Business Graphics company nor PEP the Printers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wright Business Graphics nor PEP the Printers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wright Business Graphics company nor PEP the Printers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wright Business Graphics company employs more people globally than PEP the Printers company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Wright Business Graphics nor PEP the Printers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wright Business Graphics nor PEP the Printers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wright Business Graphics nor PEP the Printers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wright Business Graphics nor PEP the Printers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wright Business Graphics nor PEP the Printers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wright Business Graphics nor PEP the Printers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References