Comparison Overview

WRI Ocean

VS

35 Mules

WRI Ocean

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

🌊 About Us 🌊 The World Resources Institute (WRI) Ocean Program advances science-based solutions to protect and restore the world’s ocean while ensuring a sustainable blue economy that supports people, biodiversity, and climate resilience. Through data-driven research, policy advocacy, and global partnerships, we empower decision-makers to tackle challenges such as ocean pollution, sustainable fisheries, marine biodiversity conservation, and climate adaptation. Our work helps governments, businesses, and communities drive action toward a healthier, more resilient ocean that benefits both nature and society. Join us in creating a future where ocean health and human prosperity thrive together. 🌎💙 📢 Follow us for the latest insights, research, and solutions in ocean sustainability.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

35 Mules

700 Universe Blvd., Juno Beach, Florida, US, 33410
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

35 Mules is an innovation hub growing and scaling startup companies and boosting economic development. Hosted by Florida Power & Light Company (FPL), 35 Mules offers: • Entrepreneurial and leadership coaching. • A tailored business curriculum. • A rent-free workspace in sunny Juno Beach, FL. • Access to over 15,000 subject matter experts. Our unique name comes from FPL’s humble beginnings in 1925, when the company began with an ice plant, a sponge fishing boat and exactly 35 mules. Learn more at 35Mules.com.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wri-ocean.jpeg
WRI Ocean
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/35-mules.jpeg
35 Mules
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
WRI Ocean
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
35 Mules
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WRI Ocean in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 35 Mules in 2025.

Incident History — WRI Ocean (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WRI Ocean cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 35 Mules (X = Date, Y = Severity)

35 Mules cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wri-ocean.jpeg
WRI Ocean
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/35-mules.jpeg
35 Mules
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

35 Mules company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to WRI Ocean company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 35 Mules company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to WRI Ocean company.

In the current year, 35 Mules company and WRI Ocean company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 35 Mules company nor WRI Ocean company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 35 Mules company nor WRI Ocean company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 35 Mules company nor WRI Ocean company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither WRI Ocean company nor 35 Mules company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither WRI Ocean nor 35 Mules holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

35 Mules company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to WRI Ocean company.

Both WRI Ocean company and 35 Mules company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither WRI Ocean nor 35 Mules holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither WRI Ocean nor 35 Mules holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither WRI Ocean nor 35 Mules holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither WRI Ocean nor 35 Mules holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither WRI Ocean nor 35 Mules holds HIPAA certification.

Neither WRI Ocean nor 35 Mules holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X