Comparison Overview

Worth Higgins & Associates

VS

Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific)

Worth Higgins & Associates

8770 Park Central Dr, Richmond, VA, 23227, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Worth Higgins & Associates is one of the largest providers of marketing communications solutions in Virginia. For 54 years the firm’s 190 employee-owners have been recognized for their ability to put ink on paper. The company began expanding its core business in the year 2000, offering e-commerce portals, branded promotional products, design services, hospitality print management, warehousing, fulfillment, and distribution services, wide-format and signage printing, finishing, and mailing. This growth provides a diverse group of value-added services, all intended to help clients deliver marketing messages effectively and efficiently. Worth Higgins & Associates’ broad range of capabilities gives us complete control over quality, scheduling, and cost. At the same time, our relative size and equipment redundancies keep us flexible and responsive, delivering a critical level of service from a single point of contact. Our ability to meet requirements in-house, turnkey, 24/7 means we can react quickly, economically, and effectively. ----------------------------------------------- Visit us at: Web: www.worthhiggins.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/WorthPrinting Instagram @worthhiggins

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 115
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific)

19 Rosebery Ave, ROSEBERY, NSW, 2018, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Jet Technologies is a specialist distributor of products to the rigid and flexible packaging industry, the industrial manufacturing industry and the print and finishing industry. Our staff are industry experts, with the knowledge and practical know how to provide premium quality products, along with outstanding customer service. Divisions: 1. Print & Finish 2. Packaging Solutions 3. Industrial

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worth-higgins-&-associates.jpeg
Worth Higgins & Associates
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jet-technologies-asia-pacific-.jpeg
Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Worth Higgins & Associates
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Worth Higgins & Associates in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) in 2025.

Incident History — Worth Higgins & Associates (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Worth Higgins & Associates cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worth-higgins-&-associates.jpeg
Worth Higgins & Associates
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jet-technologies-asia-pacific-.jpeg
Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Worth Higgins & Associates company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Worth Higgins & Associates company.

In the current year, Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) company and Worth Higgins & Associates company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) company nor Worth Higgins & Associates company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) company nor Worth Higgins & Associates company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) company nor Worth Higgins & Associates company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Worth Higgins & Associates company nor Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Worth Higgins & Associates nor Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Worth Higgins & Associates company nor Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Worth Higgins & Associates company employs more people globally than Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Worth Higgins & Associates nor Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Worth Higgins & Associates nor Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Worth Higgins & Associates nor Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Worth Higgins & Associates nor Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Worth Higgins & Associates nor Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Worth Higgins & Associates nor Jet Technologies (Asia-Pacific) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L