Comparison Overview

Wormser Casey

VS

Birnie Law Office, Inc.

Wormser Casey

5255 Winthrop Ave, Suite 4, Indianapolis, Indiana, US, 46220
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Wormser Casey is a boutique law firm based in Indianapolis, founded to serve clients in three core areas of the law: business, real estate, and private securities. We counsel businesses at every stage in their life cycle, from start-ups to emerging and established businesses. Our clients work in a number of different business sectors: computer technology and SaaS companies, marketing and design, biotechnology, restaurants, service companies, property management, leasing, and property development, just to name a few. We work with clients on all of their business and real estate legal needs, whether they are forming a new business, raising capital, buying or leasing real estate, or drafting and negotiating contracts. Clients at Wormser Legal can expect the highest quality of legal work, as well as the highest levels of communication. Communication is crucial to quality legal outcomes. We strive to ensure that our clients understand the legal issues facing their businesses, evaluating and mitigating risks, no matter the business climate. We are a trusted advisor, assisting clients with the legal issues that keep them up at night.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Birnie Law Office, Inc.

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Tim Birnie has been practicing family law and estate planning in Sebastopol, California for over 35 years. In 2004, his eldest daughter Tate Birnie joined the practice; Tate focuses her practice on estate planning and probate. In 2010, his youngest daughter Brittany Birnie Greene joined the practice; Brittany focuses her practice on family law, including collaborative practice and mediation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wormser-casey.jpeg
Wormser Casey
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birnie-law-office.jpeg
Birnie Law Office, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wormser Casey
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Birnie Law Office, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wormser Casey in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Birnie Law Office, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Wormser Casey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wormser Casey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Birnie Law Office, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Birnie Law Office, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wormser-casey.jpeg
Wormser Casey
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/birnie-law-office.jpeg
Birnie Law Office, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Birnie Law Office, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wormser Casey company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Birnie Law Office, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wormser Casey company.

In the current year, Birnie Law Office, Inc. company and Wormser Casey company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Birnie Law Office, Inc. company nor Wormser Casey company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Birnie Law Office, Inc. company nor Wormser Casey company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Birnie Law Office, Inc. company nor Wormser Casey company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wormser Casey company nor Birnie Law Office, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wormser Casey nor Birnie Law Office, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wormser Casey company nor Birnie Law Office, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Wormser Casey company and Birnie Law Office, Inc. company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Wormser Casey nor Birnie Law Office, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wormser Casey nor Birnie Law Office, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wormser Casey nor Birnie Law Office, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wormser Casey nor Birnie Law Office, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wormser Casey nor Birnie Law Office, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wormser Casey nor Birnie Law Office, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X