Comparison Overview

World Press Printing

VS

Walsworth

World Press Printing

1626 Manufacturers Dr, Fenton, Missouri, 63026, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

World Press is a team of dedicated printing professionals who care as much about your projects as you do. We work alongside our customers addressing challenges and problem-solving. The company is independently owned by Adrian Peters and Jeffrey Stern, who have been conscientious in building a culture where people take pride in their work and are passionate about their jobs. We view ourselves as partners in all of our customers’ endeavors and bring to the table the insight and acumen required to bring even the most challenging projects to life. Here you will find technical experts and craftsmen and a focus on superior service and support, because building lasting connections with customers is always our focus. We are here to listen and the team is committed to quick response times, competitive pricing, high quality deliverables, and respect for your project timelines. Give us a call and discover what we have to offer.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Walsworth

306 N Kansas Ave, None, Marceline, Missouri, US, 64658
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 650 and 699

Established in 1937, Walsworth is a family-owned commercial printer that offers end-to-end print and digital solutions. We have extensive experience in printing yearbooks, book printing, catalog printing, magazine printing, digital editions and more. Our print capabilities include sheetfed, sheetfed UV, and web, among others. Our binding option, include options for case-bound, perfect-bound, perfect case bound, saddle stitch and coil-bound projects. Our dedicated team will ensure your project comes out looking exactly the way you want it to. Walsworth is a top-five book printer, a top-five magazine printer, a top-three yearbook printer and the only family-owned printer of yearbooks. We are a full-service commercial printer large enough to offer comprehensive solutions including vast shipping, logistics and fulfillment, yet small enough to provide personalized service. We have four printing facilities across the Midwest - Marceline, Missouri; Fulton, Missouri; Saint Joseph, Michigan and Ripon, Wisconsin. If you are interested in learning more about Walsworth, please reach out to us.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 772
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-press-printing.jpeg
World Press Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walsworth-publishing.jpeg
Walsworth
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
World Press Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Walsworth
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for World Press Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Walsworth in 2025.

Incident History — World Press Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Press Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Walsworth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Walsworth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-press-printing.jpeg
World Press Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/walsworth-publishing.jpeg
Walsworth
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

World Press Printing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Walsworth company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Walsworth company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas World Press Printing company has not reported any.

In the current year, Walsworth company and World Press Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Walsworth company nor World Press Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Walsworth company has disclosed at least one data breach, while World Press Printing company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Walsworth company nor World Press Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither World Press Printing company nor Walsworth company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither World Press Printing nor Walsworth holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither World Press Printing company nor Walsworth company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Walsworth company employs more people globally than World Press Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither World Press Printing nor Walsworth holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Walsworth holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Walsworth holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Walsworth holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Walsworth holds HIPAA certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Walsworth holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L