Comparison Overview

World Press Printing

VS

Integrity Print Group

World Press Printing

1626 Manufacturers Dr, Fenton, Missouri, 63026, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

World Press is a team of dedicated printing professionals who care as much about your projects as you do. We work alongside our customers addressing challenges and problem-solving. The company is independently owned by Adrian Peters and Jeffrey Stern, who have been conscientious in building a culture where people take pride in their work and are passionate about their jobs. We view ourselves as partners in all of our customers’ endeavors and bring to the table the insight and acumen required to bring even the most challenging projects to life. Here you will find technical experts and craftsmen and a focus on superior service and support, because building lasting connections with customers is always our focus. We are here to listen and the team is committed to quick response times, competitive pricing, high quality deliverables, and respect for your project timelines. Give us a call and discover what we have to offer.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Integrity Print Group

3000 E. Colfax Avenue, Denver, CO, 80206, US
Last Update: 2025-12-18

Integrity Print Group is a Colorado company passionate about the print and communication solutions we provide our customers. We use advanced techniques, intelligent buying, and the best people available to remain dominant in our market. Our success is derived from our ability to exceed our customers' expectations. We are excited about partnering with you to help you achieve your print and communications goals cost effectively and with the best quality available. Despite the saying that quality, speed and cost effectiveness cannot exist together, we work hard every day to make these a reality for our clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-press-printing.jpeg
World Press Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrity-print-group.jpeg
Integrity Print Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
World Press Printing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Integrity Print Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for World Press Printing in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Integrity Print Group in 2025.

Incident History — World Press Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

World Press Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Integrity Print Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Integrity Print Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/world-press-printing.jpeg
World Press Printing
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrity-print-group.jpeg
Integrity Print Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both World Press Printing company and Integrity Print Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Integrity Print Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to World Press Printing company.

In the current year, Integrity Print Group company and World Press Printing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Integrity Print Group company nor World Press Printing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Integrity Print Group company nor World Press Printing company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Integrity Print Group company nor World Press Printing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither World Press Printing company nor Integrity Print Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither World Press Printing nor Integrity Print Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither World Press Printing company nor Integrity Print Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

World Press Printing company employs more people globally than Integrity Print Group company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither World Press Printing nor Integrity Print Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Integrity Print Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Integrity Print Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Integrity Print Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Integrity Print Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither World Press Printing nor Integrity Print Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L