Comparison Overview

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal

VS

Best Lawyer For The Job

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal

505 University Ave, 7th Floor, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5G 2P2
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The mandate of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (the “WSIAT” or “Tribunal”) is to hear and decide appeals from final decisions of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (the “WSIB” or “Board”) and such other matters as are assigned under the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997. As an Adjudicative Agency within the Ontario administrative justice system, the Tribunal seeks to provide quality adjudication in workplace safety and insurance appeals in accordance with the principles of natural justice on a fair and timely basis. Its legislative interpretations should provide workers, employers, the Board, government and the public with a well-reasoned commentary on legislation in the workplace safety and insurance system.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Best Lawyer For The Job

undefined, Cochrane, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Best Lawyer For The Job - our name says it all The legal system can intimidate and overwhelm anyone – we're here to help find the Best Lawyer to Match YOUR specific legal needs and create the solutions you need. At Best Lawyer For The Job, we: 1. profile and hand-select the Best Lawyer based on their ability and desire to serve someone just like you and the legal issue you have; 2. we are available 24/7/365 because we understand the days of 9 to 5, Monday to Friday are gone; 3. we also understand that getting into a lawyer's office for a face to face may not fit your schedule so we offer ALTERNATIVE ways to meet - phone, email, Skype, Google Hangouts - however you prefer to communicate; and 4. you don't pay to be matched to your Best Lawyer - you will never pay more than you would for required legal fees. The BONUS is we save you time, energy and money by selecting the Best Lawyer for you right from the start. We offer a FREE Initial Needs Assessment / telephone consultation of approximately 20 - 30 minutes at which time you speak with a lawyer and, at the end of that time, you are guaranteed the following: 1. More than one option as to solutions available; and 2. The next action steps for you to take towards resolving your legal matter. Serving clients across Western Canada, we believe we can match you with the Best Lawyer For The Job - your job - in any area of law. www.BestLawyerForTheJob.com To learn more or contact us, please visit www.BestLawyerForTheJob.com or call us directly at 888.308.9698.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workplace-safety-and-insurance-appeals-tribunal.jpeg
Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-lawyer-for-the-job.jpeg
Best Lawyer For The Job
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Best Lawyer For The Job
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Best Lawyer For The Job in 2025.

Incident History — Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Best Lawyer For The Job (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Best Lawyer For The Job cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workplace-safety-and-insurance-appeals-tribunal.jpeg
Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/best-lawyer-for-the-job.jpeg
Best Lawyer For The Job
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Best Lawyer For The Job company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Best Lawyer For The Job company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company.

In the current year, Best Lawyer For The Job company and Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Best Lawyer For The Job company nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Best Lawyer For The Job company nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Best Lawyer For The Job company nor Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company nor Best Lawyer For The Job company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal nor Best Lawyer For The Job holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company nor Best Lawyer For The Job company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal company employs more people globally than Best Lawyer For The Job company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal nor Best Lawyer For The Job holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal nor Best Lawyer For The Job holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal nor Best Lawyer For The Job holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal nor Best Lawyer For The Job holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal nor Best Lawyer For The Job holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal nor Best Lawyer For The Job holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X