Comparison Overview

WORKMAN

VS

SOFACOMPANY

WORKMAN

42,43 Sunflower Building, Liberty Market ( Next to HKB), Gulberg, Lahore, 54660, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Workman is a progressive manufacturer, retailer of home and office furniture since 1980.It is at the forefront of the market providing the highest standards of quality, design and ergonomics. It has been developing and retailing full interior solutions for its wide range of clients. Workman does not just sell furniture, it provides complete office interior solutions from theme conception, space planning, full interior designing to physically providing all that has been put down as thoughts.Workman is ISO 9001 certified.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SOFACOMPANY

Selandia Park 1, Ringsted, 4100, DK
Last Update: 2025-11-21

At SOFACOMPANY we do things a bit differently, as especially seen in our unique approach to craftsmanship and innovation. We’ve taken full control of every link in our value chain, thereby managing everything ourselves from design, to sales, and to our own physical stores, currently counting 31 across 8 European markets. All in all, making it possible offer Danish design of an exceptional quality that’s much higher than the price – as well as fully customised solutions for all professionals. SOFACOMPANY Design to love. Prices to like.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 216
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workman.jpeg
WORKMAN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sofacompany.jpeg
SOFACOMPANY
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
WORKMAN
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SOFACOMPANY
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WORKMAN in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SOFACOMPANY in 2025.

Incident History — WORKMAN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WORKMAN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SOFACOMPANY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SOFACOMPANY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workman.jpeg
WORKMAN
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sofacompany.jpeg
SOFACOMPANY
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

WORKMAN company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SOFACOMPANY company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SOFACOMPANY company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to WORKMAN company.

In the current year, SOFACOMPANY company and WORKMAN company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SOFACOMPANY company nor WORKMAN company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SOFACOMPANY company nor WORKMAN company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SOFACOMPANY company nor WORKMAN company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither WORKMAN company nor SOFACOMPANY company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither WORKMAN nor SOFACOMPANY holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

SOFACOMPANY company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to WORKMAN company.

SOFACOMPANY company employs more people globally than WORKMAN company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither WORKMAN nor SOFACOMPANY holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor SOFACOMPANY holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor SOFACOMPANY holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor SOFACOMPANY holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor SOFACOMPANY holds HIPAA certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor SOFACOMPANY holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.