Comparison Overview

WORKMAN

VS

Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co

WORKMAN

42,43 Sunflower Building, Liberty Market ( Next to HKB), Gulberg, Lahore, 54660, PK
Last Update: 2025-11-23

Workman is a progressive manufacturer, retailer of home and office furniture since 1980.It is at the forefront of the market providing the highest standards of quality, design and ergonomics. It has been developing and retailing full interior solutions for its wide range of clients. Workman does not just sell furniture, it provides complete office interior solutions from theme conception, space planning, full interior designing to physically providing all that has been put down as thoughts.Workman is ISO 9001 certified.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 60
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co

995 36th St SE, Grand Rapids, Michigan, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co is a 79 year old Company that produces mattresses and foundations in our own factory in Grand Rapids Michigan. We sell them directly through our 8 retail outlets in West Michigan and on our website. By making all our own mattresses and selling them direct to the consumer, we can offer better values than any other furniture or mattress store. We offer a large selection of unique mattresses which include innerspring mattresses with unique interlocking flexible coils, latex mattresses, and gel memory foam mattresses. We offer the best locally built mattress that your hard earned money can buy!

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workman.jpeg
WORKMAN
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jsmattress-co.jpeg
Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
WORKMAN
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WORKMAN in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co in 2025.

Incident History — WORKMAN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WORKMAN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workman.jpeg
WORKMAN
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jsmattress-co.jpeg
Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

WORKMAN company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to WORKMAN company.

In the current year, Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co company and WORKMAN company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co company nor WORKMAN company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co company nor WORKMAN company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co company nor WORKMAN company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither WORKMAN company nor Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither WORKMAN nor Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither WORKMAN company nor Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

WORKMAN company employs more people globally than Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither WORKMAN nor Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co holds HIPAA certification.

Neither WORKMAN nor Jonathan Stevens Mattress Co holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.