Comparison Overview

Working Dog Magazine

VS

Michigan Quarterly Review

Working Dog Magazine

undefined, Nashville, TN, 37206, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Working Dog Magazine® (WDM) is your ultimate guide to the working dog industry. WDM is the premier destination and most widely trusted resource for features on K9 teams, specialized tactics, training techniques, and working dog topics. ✰ PUBLISHING – Every issue of Working Dog Magazine connects 31.5 thousand readers on a personal level with working dog professionals who are serious about success. WDM contains thought-provoking editorial, fresh approaches to training techniques, and useful how-to information. WDM empowers readers to make the best choices when it comes to training, health, technology, vendors, gear, and so much more. ✰ DIGITAL – K9 handling isn’t a once-a-quarter task; it requires day-to-day, moment-to-moment engagement. With workingdogmagazine.com and our weekly e-newsletter, Working Dog Journal, you are always connected to breaking news and have direct access to exclusive WDM updates, articles, podcasts, and events. ✰ PODCAST – Working Dog Podcast™ — a podcast made by, for, and about people who love dogs. Whether you’re a proud dog owner, breeder, trainer, a lover of all things canine, or simply someone who loves listening to engaging and informative conversations, this podcast is for you. Expect to hear from experts in the field, fascinating stories about dogs and their owners, breed profiles, training tips, and much more. With engaging hosts and a lineup of expert guests, this podcast is sure to delight and inform anyone who shares our passion for dogs. ✰ EVENTS – It doesn’t get more real than attending a Working Dog Magazine event. Hundreds of dedicated, ambitious men and women turn out for WDM’s annual conference: the Working Dog Training Conference (WDTC). This is an educational event, rich in instructional training and idea sharing. WDTC™ is also a serious networking opportunity where up-and-comers mix freely with industry leaders.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Michigan Quarterly Review

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Founded in 1962, the Michigan Quarterly Review is the University of Michigan's flagship literary journal. MQR publishes short fiction, essays, poetry, and translation four times a year. Twice a year, MQR publishes a special themed issue focused on addressing a single theme. Past special issues have included writing on the Flint Water Crisis, the Great Lakes, Greece, China, and Caregiving. Our magazine embraces creative urgency and cultural relevance, aiming to challenge conventions and address long-overdue conversations. As we continue to promote an expansive and inclusive vision, we seek work from established and emerging writers with diverse aesthetics and experiences. If you’re interested in subscribing, visit the “Shop,” where you can start a yearly subscription or purchase single back issues from our archive. If you’re interested in submitting, take a look at our Masthead for more on what our editors are looking for, then visit our Submission page for upcoming calls for open and themed issues.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/working-dog-magazine.jpeg
Working Dog Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-quarterly-review.jpeg
Michigan Quarterly Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Working Dog Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Michigan Quarterly Review
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Working Dog Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Michigan Quarterly Review in 2025.

Incident History — Working Dog Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Working Dog Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Michigan Quarterly Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Michigan Quarterly Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/working-dog-magazine.jpeg
Working Dog Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/michigan-quarterly-review.jpeg
Michigan Quarterly Review
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Michigan Quarterly Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Working Dog Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Michigan Quarterly Review company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Working Dog Magazine company.

In the current year, Michigan Quarterly Review company and Working Dog Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review company nor Working Dog Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review company nor Working Dog Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Michigan Quarterly Review company nor Working Dog Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Working Dog Magazine company nor Michigan Quarterly Review company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Working Dog Magazine nor Michigan Quarterly Review holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Working Dog Magazine company nor Michigan Quarterly Review company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Michigan Quarterly Review company employs more people globally than Working Dog Magazine company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Working Dog Magazine nor Michigan Quarterly Review holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Working Dog Magazine nor Michigan Quarterly Review holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Working Dog Magazine nor Michigan Quarterly Review holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Working Dog Magazine nor Michigan Quarterly Review holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Working Dog Magazine nor Michigan Quarterly Review holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Working Dog Magazine nor Michigan Quarterly Review holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.