Comparison Overview

Work for Good

VS

Friends of the WNC Nature Center

Work for Good

London, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://workforgood.co.uk/

Transforming Giving, One Connection at a Time: Our innovative sales fundraising platform has facilitated over £4 million in donations and sales pledges for charities. With a network boasting over 1500 charities, including revered names like Teenage Cancer Trust, Rewilding Britain, and Alzheimer’s Research UK, as well as trusted brands like The Trussell Trust, Refuge, DEC, and Mind, we're proud to be the bridge between SME businesses and causes that matter to them. From grassroots local organisations to renowned national charities, our platform democratises giving, making it accessible to all. Through our user-friendly online tools, we empower SMEs to seamlessly integrate charitable giving into their sales strategies. Join us in simplifying the process of giving back, one transaction at a time.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Friends of the WNC Nature Center

75 Gashes Creek Road, Asheville, North Carolina, 28805, US
Last Update: 2025-12-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.wildwnc.org/

The Friends are a vital partner with the WNC Nature Center. With their donors and members, the Friends enrich the Nature Center’s mission to connect people with the plants and animals of the Southern Appalachian Mountains. As a conservation organization, the Friends inspires a passion to know more, care more, and do more for the wildlife of the Southern Appalachian Mountains. They advance the critical work of the WNC Nature Center by supporting its growth and development through fundraising, membership, outreach education, marketing, and volunteer services.

NAICS: 561499
NAICS Definition: All Other Business Support Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workforgooduk.jpeg
Work for Good
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/friends-of-the-wnc-nature-center.jpeg
Friends of the WNC Nature Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Work for Good
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Friends of the WNC Nature Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Work for Good in 2025.

Incidents vs Fundraising Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Friends of the WNC Nature Center in 2025.

Incident History — Work for Good (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Work for Good cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Friends of the WNC Nature Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Friends of the WNC Nature Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workforgooduk.jpeg
Work for Good
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/friends-of-the-wnc-nature-center.jpeg
Friends of the WNC Nature Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Friends of the WNC Nature Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Work for Good company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Friends of the WNC Nature Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Work for Good company.

In the current year, Friends of the WNC Nature Center company and Work for Good company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Friends of the WNC Nature Center company nor Work for Good company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Friends of the WNC Nature Center company nor Work for Good company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Friends of the WNC Nature Center company nor Work for Good company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Work for Good company nor Friends of the WNC Nature Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Work for Good nor Friends of the WNC Nature Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Work for Good company nor Friends of the WNC Nature Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Friends of the WNC Nature Center company employs more people globally than Work for Good company, reflecting its scale as a Fundraising.

Neither Work for Good nor Friends of the WNC Nature Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Work for Good nor Friends of the WNC Nature Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Work for Good nor Friends of the WNC Nature Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Work for Good nor Friends of the WNC Nature Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Work for Good nor Friends of the WNC Nature Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Work for Good nor Friends of the WNC Nature Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
References
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Published
Date
2025-12-20
Updated
Date
2025-12-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References