Comparison Overview

North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance

VS

GSA

North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance

1600 E Century Ave Suite One, Bismarck, North Dakota, US, 58503
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Workforce Safety & Insurance is the North Dakota workers'​ compensation agency located at 1600 E. Century Avenue, Bismarck, North Dakota, 58506 North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance is the sole provider and administrator of the workers’ compensation system in North Dakota.

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

GSA

1800 F St. NW, Washington, D.C., US, 20405
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

General Services Administration (GSA) is an independent agency of the United States government established in 1949 to help manage and support the basic functioning of federal agencies. Our organization includes the Public Buildings Service (PBS), Federal Acquisition Service (FAS), and a variety of Service and Staff Offices. Learn more about our organization at gsa.gov. Our Mission GSA's mission is to deliver value and savings in real estate, acquisition, technology, and other mission-support services across government. Our Vision Effective and efficient government for the American people. Our Values Service, Accountability, and Innovation ----------- You can also find us on these social media sites: Twitter: https://twitter.com/usgsa Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/GSA/ Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/usgsa/

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 13,462
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workforce-safety-&-insurance.jpeg
North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GSA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GSA in 2025.

Incident History — North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/workforce-safety-&-insurance.jpeg
North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Email Attachment
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gsa.jpeg
GSA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GSA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GSA company has not reported any.

In the current year, GSA company and North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GSA company nor North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GSA company nor North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while GSA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance company nor GSA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance nor GSA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GSA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance company.

GSA company employs more people globally than North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance nor GSA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance nor GSA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance nor GSA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance nor GSA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance nor GSA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither North Dakota Workforce Safety & Insurance nor GSA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X