Comparison Overview

Worboys Design

VS

Collabra

Worboys Design

274 Detroit St, Denver, CO, 80206, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Cultivating Authentic Brand Experiences For over 20 years, Worboys has had the great pleasure of working with some of the most influential businesses in the Multifamily industry — investment companies, developers, management companies, architecture firms and interior design agencies. We have participated at every stage of development and helped to build brand awareness for a diverse portfolio of properties across the United States. While our work lives beyond this industry, Multifamily will always feel like home.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Collabra

Esperantoplatsen 7-9, Göteborg, undefined, 411 19, SE
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Maximize the impact of branding on pack without all the technical fuss. Your packaging is by far the most important brand channel. Every potential customer comes in contact with your packaging when shopping and then brings it home, allowing you to keep communicating your brand every day. But packaging is also the media that’s most difficult and complicated to realize when it comes to management, implementation and print quality. Collabra handles Artwork Management and all technical aspects of pack design implementation, allowing you to focus entirely on branding. We do Artwork Management. Nothing else.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worboysdesign.jpeg
Worboys Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/collabra.jpeg
Collabra
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Worboys Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Collabra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Worboys Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Collabra in 2025.

Incident History — Worboys Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Worboys Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Collabra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Collabra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/worboysdesign.jpeg
Worboys Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/collabra.jpeg
Collabra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Collabra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Worboys Design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Collabra company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Worboys Design company.

In the current year, Collabra company and Worboys Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Collabra company nor Worboys Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Collabra company nor Worboys Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Collabra company nor Worboys Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Worboys Design company nor Collabra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Worboys Design nor Collabra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Worboys Design company nor Collabra company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Collabra company employs more people globally than Worboys Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Worboys Design nor Collabra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Worboys Design nor Collabra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Worboys Design nor Collabra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Worboys Design nor Collabra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Worboys Design nor Collabra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Worboys Design nor Collabra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X