Comparison Overview

Woods Rogers

VS

Stuart Maue

Woods Rogers

10 South Jefferson Street, Suite 1800, Roanoke, VA, US, 24011
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Woods Rogers is a Virginia-based law firm delivering uncommon service and solutions. More than 135 attorneys collaborate across disciplines to provide business-focused legal advice to a diverse range of clients, from individuals to large corporations. With outstanding talent, strong relationships, and an exceptional culture, we are redefining the legal experience for clients. Learn more at woodsrogers.com. Some sections of this social media profile describe legal matters handled in the past by Woods Rogers Vandeventer Black PLC, Woods Rogers PLC, or Vandeventer Black LLP and may constitute attorney advertising. Results for these matters depended upon a variety of factors unique to their specific situations and they do not guarantee or predict similar results in future matters. Neither the content on this profile nor correspondence between you and the profile manager are intended to provide legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Likes and shares are not endorsements or advice. Please consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 296
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stuart Maue

3840 McKelvey Road, None, St. Louis, MO, US, 63044
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Legal Bill Review * Legal Audit * Bankruptcy * Vendor Review Services * Fee Expert Established in 1985, Stuart Maue analyzes legal costs and develops customized cost management solutions for clients in the areas of: legal bill analysis, bankruptcy proceedings, and vendor invoice review. Stuart Maue employs a team of full-time attorneys and accountants and utilizes state-of-the-art technology to deliver the most thorough and reliable analysis in the industry. Our clients recognize significant savings as well as gain vital insights into their legal spend.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woodsrogers.jpeg
Woods Rogers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stuart-maue.jpeg
Stuart Maue
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Woods Rogers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stuart Maue
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woods Rogers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stuart Maue in 2025.

Incident History — Woods Rogers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woods Rogers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stuart Maue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stuart Maue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woodsrogers.jpeg
Woods Rogers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stuart-maue.jpeg
Stuart Maue
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Woods Rogers company and Stuart Maue company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Stuart Maue company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Woods Rogers company.

In the current year, Stuart Maue company and Woods Rogers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stuart Maue company nor Woods Rogers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stuart Maue company nor Woods Rogers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stuart Maue company nor Woods Rogers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Woods Rogers company nor Stuart Maue company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Woods Rogers nor Stuart Maue holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Woods Rogers company nor Stuart Maue company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Woods Rogers company employs more people globally than Stuart Maue company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Woods Rogers nor Stuart Maue holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Woods Rogers nor Stuart Maue holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Woods Rogers nor Stuart Maue holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Woods Rogers nor Stuart Maue holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Woods Rogers nor Stuart Maue holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Woods Rogers nor Stuart Maue holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X