Comparison Overview

Woodland Park Zoo

VS

Design Museum Gent

Woodland Park Zoo

5500 Phinney Ave N, Seattle, 98103, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.zoo.org/

For more than 110 years, Woodland Park Zoo has been a cherished community resource and a unique urban oasis. Generations of Puget Sound families have come to the zoo to marvel at the animals and be inspired by the peaceful and beautiful surroundings. Woodland Park Zoo is committed to attracting, developing and retaining highly qualified employees. As a 24/7 environment, we have a variety of career opportunities, including positions in animal management, development, education, facilities, horticulture, guest services, information technology, marketing, retail, security and more. At the zoo, employment is more than just a job. Employees are able to develop their appreciation of animals, the natural world and the need for conservation on a local and global level, while contributing their specific skills and talents to our mission: Woodland Park Zoo saves animals and their habitats through conservation leadership and engaging experiences, inspiring people to learn, care and act.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 513
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Design Museum Gent

Jan Breydelstraat 5, Gent, 9000, BE
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.designmuseumgent.be

Het museum is het enige designmuseum in België. Het museumcomplex, gelegen in de historische stads­­­­­­kern, bestaat uit een statig 18de-eeuws herenhuis en een moderne vleugel. Het bezit een omvangrijke en toonaangevende collectie Belgisch design ondersteund door internationale topstukken. De verzameling vangt aan met de art nouveau van Henry Van de Velde en gaat tot de avantgarde vormgeving van nu. Aan de hand van spraakmakende tentoonstellingen en wisselende collectiepresentaties biedt het museum een verrassende kijk op modern en actueel design van 1890 tot vandaag.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woodland-park-zoo.jpeg
Woodland Park Zoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-museum-gent.jpeg
Design Museum Gent
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Woodland Park Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Design Museum Gent
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Woodland Park Zoo in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Museum Gent in 2026.

Incident History — Woodland Park Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Woodland Park Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Design Museum Gent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Museum Gent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/woodland-park-zoo.jpeg
Woodland Park Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-museum-gent.jpeg
Design Museum Gent
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Woodland Park Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Design Museum Gent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Design Museum Gent company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Woodland Park Zoo company.

In the current year, Design Museum Gent company and Woodland Park Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Design Museum Gent company nor Woodland Park Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Design Museum Gent company nor Woodland Park Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Design Museum Gent company nor Woodland Park Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Woodland Park Zoo company nor Design Museum Gent company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Woodland Park Zoo nor Design Museum Gent holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Woodland Park Zoo company nor Design Museum Gent company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Woodland Park Zoo company employs more people globally than Design Museum Gent company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Woodland Park Zoo nor Design Museum Gent holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Woodland Park Zoo nor Design Museum Gent holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Woodland Park Zoo nor Design Museum Gent holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Woodland Park Zoo nor Design Museum Gent holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Woodland Park Zoo nor Design Museum Gent holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Woodland Park Zoo nor Design Museum Gent holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References