Comparison Overview

Wondershare Recoverit

VS

Cisco

Wondershare Recoverit

200-4445 Lougheed Hwy, Burnaby, BC Canada V5C 0E4, Vancouver, British Columbia, CA, 200-4445
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Recovers deleted or lost photos, videos, documents, email files, etc. Recovers data from hard drive, SD card, external USB drives, etc. Recovers lost data from formatted, RAW, or damaged partitions. Recovers 100 MB of files for free without subscription requirements.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Cisco

Tasman Way, San Jose, CA, US, 95134
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 600 and 649

Cisco is the worldwide technology leader that is revolutionizing the way organizations connect and protect in the AI era. For more than 40 years, Cisco has securely connected the world. With its industry leading AI-powered solutions and services, Cisco enables its customers, partners and communities to unlock innovation, enhance productivity and strengthen digital resilience. With purpose at its core, Cisco remains committed to creating a more connected and inclusive future for all.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 95,370
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wondershare-recoverit.jpeg
Wondershare Recoverit
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cisco.jpeg
Cisco
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wondershare Recoverit
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cisco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wondershare Recoverit in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Cisco has 34.23% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Wondershare Recoverit (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wondershare Recoverit cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cisco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cisco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wondershare-recoverit.jpeg
Wondershare Recoverit
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network, Misconfigured Cloud Storage, Embedded Overly Permissive Tokens
Motivation: Data Theft, Supply Chain Compromise, AI Model Manipulation, Intellectual Property Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cisco.jpeg
Cisco
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote (HTTP requests to web-based management interface)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploiting misconfigured Spam Quarantine feature and exposed ports
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Wondershare Recoverit company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cisco company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cisco company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Wondershare Recoverit company.

In the current year, Cisco company has reported more cyber incidents than Wondershare Recoverit company.

Cisco company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Wondershare Recoverit company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Cisco company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Wondershare Recoverit company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Cisco company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Wondershare Recoverit company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Wondershare Recoverit company and Cisco company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Wondershare Recoverit nor Cisco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cisco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Wondershare Recoverit company.

Cisco company employs more people globally than Wondershare Recoverit company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Wondershare Recoverit nor Cisco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wondershare Recoverit nor Cisco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wondershare Recoverit nor Cisco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wondershare Recoverit nor Cisco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wondershare Recoverit nor Cisco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wondershare Recoverit nor Cisco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.