Comparison Overview

Women's Health Matters

VS

Bipartisan Policy Center

Women's Health Matters

1 Collett Pl, Building 1, Pearce, Australian Capital Territory, AU, 2607
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Women’s Health Matters is an independent, non-partisan think tank that works to improve the health and well-being of women in the ACT and surrounding region. Our core business is evidence-based social research, policy development, advocacy and health promotion. We are regarded as the voice for women’s health and well being in the ACT. Our work is used by governments, policy makers and peak bodies to design, improve and deliver services and responses specific to the needs of women. We identify current and emerging issues impacting women’s health and well being and develop evidence-based solutions to close the gaps. Because women do health differently, our research and advocacy is informed by women for women. We bring their stories to the decision-making table.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bipartisan Policy Center

1225 Eye St. NW, Suite 1000, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20005
Last Update: 2025-11-29

Ideas. Action. Results. Our mission: - Build connections. - Negotiate policy. - Achieve bipartisan solutions. - Improve lives. The Bipartisan Policy Center and Bipartisan Policy Center Action spend every day getting stuff done for democracy. No organization in America has a better track record of fostering relationships and bringing together the left and the right to produce real results. We combine the best ideas from both parties to promote health, security, opportunity, and civic participation for all Americans. We are on the ground doing the hard work. We deliver the direct support and policy insights members of Congress need to craft legislation that actually passes.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 176
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/womenshealthmatters.jpeg
Women's Health Matters
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bipartisan-policy-center.jpeg
Bipartisan Policy Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Women's Health Matters
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bipartisan Policy Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Women's Health Matters in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bipartisan Policy Center in 2025.

Incident History — Women's Health Matters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Women's Health Matters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bipartisan Policy Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bipartisan Policy Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/womenshealthmatters.jpeg
Women's Health Matters
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bipartisan-policy-center.jpeg
Bipartisan Policy Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bipartisan Policy Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Women's Health Matters company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bipartisan Policy Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Women's Health Matters company.

In the current year, Bipartisan Policy Center company and Women's Health Matters company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bipartisan Policy Center company nor Women's Health Matters company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bipartisan Policy Center company nor Women's Health Matters company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bipartisan Policy Center company nor Women's Health Matters company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Women's Health Matters company nor Bipartisan Policy Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Women's Health Matters nor Bipartisan Policy Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Women's Health Matters company nor Bipartisan Policy Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bipartisan Policy Center company employs more people globally than Women's Health Matters company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Women's Health Matters nor Bipartisan Policy Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Women's Health Matters nor Bipartisan Policy Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Women's Health Matters nor Bipartisan Policy Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Women's Health Matters nor Bipartisan Policy Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Women's Health Matters nor Bipartisan Policy Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Women's Health Matters nor Bipartisan Policy Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X