Comparison Overview

Women's Fund of Omaha

VS

We Animals

Women's Fund of Omaha

1111 N 13th St, Ste 106, Omaha, NE, 68102, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.omahawomensfund.org

The Women's Fund of Omaha addresses inequities in our community through collaboration that identifies, researches and creates solutions to advance, educate and fund lasting impact. We are working to create a community where women and girls—and all people—have the opportunity to reach their full potential. Since 1990, the Women's Fund has provided more than $35 million in grants to programs working to address the most crucial issues facing local women and girls as identified by our research. We are the only foundation that provides grants exclusively to programs for anyone who identifies as a woman or girl, and we are the leading organization researching issues concerning them.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

We Animals

undefined, Toronto, ON, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2026-03-22
Between 750 and 799
https://weanimals.org/

Founded by award-winning photojournalist Jo-Anne McArthur, We Animals advocates for animals through photojournalism. Now with over 120 international photographers, our global investigations and stories expose our complex relationships with animals, create ethical and cultural shifts in society, and empower human capacity for compassion and change. The We Animals stock site, with over 30,000 visuals, serves as a free, preeminent global resource for anyone helping animals: academics, campaigners, journalists, researchers, and writers. Our ground-breaking animal photojournalism supports the efforts of advocacy communities at large and facilitates changes in attitudes and behaviours more broadly. We understand that seeing is a crucial component of the diverse efforts necessary to erode and eventually end the abuse of animals.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/women's-fund-of-omaha.jpeg
Women's Fund of Omaha
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weanimalsmedia.jpeg
We Animals
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Women's Fund of Omaha
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
We Animals
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organization Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Women's Fund of Omaha in 2026.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organization Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for We Animals in 2026.

Incident History — Women's Fund of Omaha (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Women's Fund of Omaha cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — We Animals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

We Animals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/women's-fund-of-omaha.jpeg
Women's Fund of Omaha
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/weanimalsmedia.jpeg
We Animals
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Women's Fund of Omaha company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to We Animals company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, We Animals company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Women's Fund of Omaha company.

In the current year, We Animals company and Women's Fund of Omaha company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither We Animals company nor Women's Fund of Omaha company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither We Animals company nor Women's Fund of Omaha company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither We Animals company nor Women's Fund of Omaha company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Women's Fund of Omaha company nor We Animals company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Women's Fund of Omaha nor We Animals holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Women's Fund of Omaha company nor We Animals company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Women's Fund of Omaha company employs more people globally than We Animals company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organization Management.

Neither Women's Fund of Omaha nor We Animals holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Women's Fund of Omaha nor We Animals holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Women's Fund of Omaha nor We Animals holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Women's Fund of Omaha nor We Animals holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Women's Fund of Omaha nor We Animals holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Women's Fund of Omaha nor We Animals holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References