Comparison Overview

Wisconsin Historical Society

VS

The Alamo

Wisconsin Historical Society

816 State St, Madison, WI, 53706, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Wisconsin Historical Society helps people connect to the past by collecting, preserving and sharing stories. The Society was founded in 1846, two years before Wisconsin became the 30th state. Through its library, archives, historic sites and museums, historic preservation and local history programs, publications, school services and website, it ranks as one of the largest, most active, and most diversified state historical societies in the nation.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 282
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Alamo

300 Alamo Plaza, San Antonio, Texas, US, 78209
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Located in the heart of San Antonio, the Alamo stands as the Shrine of Texas Liberty. More than 1.6 million visitors travel to the site each year, making it the #1 most visited destination in the State of Texas. The 300-year history of the Alamo is world-renowned and represents the core of Texas’ identity today. In 1960, the Alamo was designated a United States National Historic Landmark, and in 2015, it became part of the Lone Star State's only UNESCO World Heritage Site. Witness living history, experience authentic artifacts, and explore an iconic landmark that shaped the country. Visit theAlamo.org.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 118
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wisconsin-historical-society.jpeg
Wisconsin Historical Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/officialalamo.jpeg
The Alamo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Wisconsin Historical Society
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Alamo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wisconsin Historical Society in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Alamo in 2025.

Incident History — Wisconsin Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wisconsin Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Alamo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Alamo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wisconsin-historical-society.jpeg
Wisconsin Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/officialalamo.jpeg
The Alamo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Wisconsin Historical Society company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The Alamo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Alamo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Wisconsin Historical Society company.

In the current year, The Alamo company and Wisconsin Historical Society company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Alamo company nor Wisconsin Historical Society company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Alamo company nor Wisconsin Historical Society company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Alamo company nor Wisconsin Historical Society company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Wisconsin Historical Society company nor The Alamo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Wisconsin Historical Society nor The Alamo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Wisconsin Historical Society company nor The Alamo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Wisconsin Historical Society company employs more people globally than The Alamo company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Wisconsin Historical Society nor The Alamo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Wisconsin Historical Society nor The Alamo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Wisconsin Historical Society nor The Alamo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Wisconsin Historical Society nor The Alamo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Wisconsin Historical Society nor The Alamo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Wisconsin Historical Society nor The Alamo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X